Jinju Sexual Assault Attorney | Acquittal on a Sexual Assault Charge Upheld Despite the Prosecutor's Appeal

The client's account, as the attorney understood it through the consultation, was as follows.

The client explained that he runs a bar and was ordinarily on close terms with the part-time workers in their twenties.

He explained that on the day of the incident he was also spending time drinking with the part-time workers, when one of them asked whether he could invite a friend.

The client explained that he readily agreed, and a woman, A, who appeared to be in her early twenties, came into the bar.

He explained that when the gathering ended, he sent everyone home so that he could tidy up the bar, but A came back and asked whether she could sleep in the establishment's lodging.

The client explained that, although he was taken aback, A seemed to have her reasons, so he went into the lodging with her, and as soon as A entered the lodging she kissed him.

He explained that he was caught up in the moment, but troubled by the idea of being physically intimate with someone about twenty years younger than himself, he pushed A away and went home.

He explained that a few days later he received a call from the police asking him to undergo a police investigation on a rape charge, and, taken aback, he sought a Jinju sexual assault attorney and visited the firm.

The Jinju sexual assault attorney's client felt deeply wronged, saying that there had been no rape and indeed no sexual intercourse at all.

To obtain an acquittal on the rape charge, it was necessary to prove that no rape had occurred.

Through collaboration with the firm's evidence investigation and digital forensics team, the decision was made to lawfully gather evidence favorable to the client.

In addition, for the client who was facing a police investigation, a police investigation simulation was conducted, and the attorney accompanied him to the police investigation to prevent statements unfavorable to the client.

The Jinju sexual assault attorney emphasized that it was A, not the client, who first initiated physical contact.

The client had no intention of having sexual intercourse with A or of spending the night together, but A first asked the client to let her sleep over.

In addition, A first kissed the client and tried to proceed naturally to sexual intercourse.

The client immediately pushed A away and went outside, so the client never raped A.

The Jinju sexual assault attorney emphasized that A's statement lacked credibility.

A stated that she had resisted as much as she could, but that the client forcibly kissed her and attempted physical contact.

However, according to the victim's written statement that the Firm obtained, the victim told the client about her family circumstances and wiped away tears.

If A had felt uncomfortable being with the client and had been subjected to forced physical contact, she could not have confided her family circumstances.

On these grounds, the Jinju sexual assault attorney strongly argued that the client was not guilty of rape.