Deals & Cases

Insult
InsultNon-prosecution

Elements of an Insult Charge | Non-Prosecution Decision for a Client Subject to a Criminal Complaint for Insult

The client who requested a consultation on the elements of the crime of insult was sued over a comment posted on the Internet.

To defend against punishment, the client requested assistance from an attorney with extensive experience handling such cases.

1. The Circumstances of the Case of the Client Who Held a Consultation on the Elements of an Insult Charge

The circumstances of the client's case, for which a consultation was conducted regarding the elements of the crime of insult and punishment for insult, are as follows.

The client was going through a psychologically very unstable period, and after seeing an article about a certain celebrity, became angry and posted a malicious comment.

About one year later, the client received a call to appear for questioning, having been told by the police station that a complaint had been filed for online insult, and immediately deleted the comment and completed the questioning alone.


However, upon receiving a referral decision after the police questioning, feeling regret over the inadequate initial response and fear of punishment, the client immediately requested assistance from this firm's insult crime attorney to defend against punishment.

2. What Are the Elements and Penalty Range for an Insult Charge?

What are the elements of the crime of insult and the level of punishment?

We will explain the elements of the crime of insult, along with the level of punishment.

As social media and online communities develop, communication based on them is becoming more active.

Along with this, cases of online insult are also surging, and intense legal responses related to this are increasing as well.

Article 311 Insult

A person who publicly insults another shall be punished by imprisonment with or without labor for up to one year, or by a fine of up to 2 million won.


Online insult is the same as defamation in that the protected legal interest is external reputation, but it is distinguished from defamation in that there is no statement of a specific fact.

In addition, the crime of insult is a crime requiring a complaint to prosecute, and a public prosecution may be brought only if the victim files a complaint.

When a person insults another online, the person is punished for the crime of insult under the Criminal Act, and even a single malicious comment directed at a nickname may become subject to criminal punishment.

Even if it is not a real name, because the IP address and account information remain, identity may be disclosed even without clear identification if the investigative agency requests it, so even a comment posted anonymously makes it difficult to avoid responsibility.

Under the Criminal Act, the crime of insult provides that a person who publicly insults another shall be punished, and a person may be punished for using abusive language while disparaging another's worth.

The elements of the crime of insult are as follows.

SpecificityA specific identity must be identified
Where it can be clearly known who the victim is
PublicityPossibility of dissemination
An act in a place where many people can see or hear it (if only the two parties are present, a complaint is not possible)


Malicious comments related to famous celebrities are often let go, but there are many cases in which complaints are actually filed, and in severe cases they may actually lead to punishment.

The client's comment was also one leaving contemptuous sentiment toward the celebrity, and because an insulting expression directed at a specific person was established, it was a situation in which it was difficult to avoid heavy punishment for the crime of insult.

3. The Assistance Provided After Confirming the Elements of an Insult Charge

The attorney, who conducted a consultation on the elements and level of punishment for the crime of insult, provided the following assistance.

The Client Is a Diligent Member of Society Who Currently Supports the Client's Parents

What assistance was provided after confirming the elements of the crime of insult

The attorney requested that consideration be given to the fact that the client was solely supporting his elderly parents and was in an emotionally and financially unstable situation as he cared for his ailing father in his stead.

The attorney also argued that the client was a diligent member of society who had lived without a single prior conviction and who had devoted himself to his workplace, where he had worked for more than 10 years.

The attorney argued that, at the time he posted the comment, the client had lent a large sum of money to a friend who had not repaid it for several years, leaving him under extreme mental stress, and that, due to this mental instability and stress, he posted the comment in a moment of anger.

However, the attorney argued that, after rereading the comment, the client was ashamed of and remorseful for his wrongdoing, saying he did not understand why he had posted such a comment, and that he expressed he would never make such a mistake again.

Argument That the Client Is Sincerely Repentant

The attorney argued that the client was sincerely repenting of the wrongdoing.

The client had forgotten having posted the comment, and after receiving contact from the investigative agency and confirming the comment, the client immediately deleted it.

The client argued that, having posted the comment in a moment of being unable to control emotion and thus apparently having deeply hurt the victim, the client hoped to have an opportunity to apologize.

On this basis, the client submitted a handwritten letter of repentance and argued for consideration of the client's resolve never to repeat the same mistake.

4. Non-Prosecution Decision for a Client Who Held a Consultation on the Elements of an Insult Charge, Through Daeryun's Assistance

Client who consulted on the elements of insult; suspension of indictment decision through Daeryun's assistance

The client, who requested a consultation on the elements of insult, received a non-prosecution disposition from the prosecution with the assistance of an attorney.

The sentencing conditions set out in the Criminal Act are as follows.

Article 51 (Conditions for Sentencing) The following matters shall be taken into account in determining a sentence.

The age, character and conduct, intelligence, and environment of the offender

The offender's relationship to the victim

The motive for the offense, and the means and result

Circumstances after the offense


A comment left without much thought may lead to a complaint for online insult, so one must respond to the best of one's ability to avoid leaving a criminal record.

In particular, as in the client's case, if a referral decision is received during the police investigation, it is important to obtain the assistance of a specialized attorney in order to establish a strategy to defend against punishment and respond closely during a subsequent prosecutorial investigation.

If you face the risk of punishment for online insult, we hope you overcome the difficulty through the assistance of this firm's criminal law specialist attorneys, who have extensive experience handling online insult cases.

모욕죄성립요건

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Insult: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney ChanWoo JEONG

ChanWoo JEONG

T. 070-5221-2387

Extensive corporate legal litigation and advisory experience · Attorney specializing in inheritance/tax/administrative law

Attorney MinSu KIM

MinSu KIM

T. 070-5214-2362

Extensive Experience in Criminal, Drunk Driving, and Traffic Accident Cases · Attorney Specializing in Drunk Driving and Traffic Accidents/Corporate Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy

Attorney HyoJoon KIM

HyoJoon KIM

T. 070-7510-1044

Criminal/Civil Law Attorney

Attorney SaBong JEONG

SaBong JEONG

T. 070-7510-2014

Experience as In-house Counsel at Samsung Electronics and Samsung SDS

Attorney EunSung LEE

EunSung LEE

T. 070-5221-0865

Fair Trade Specialist Attorney · Graduate of Seoul National University

Attorney EunSol LEE

EunSol LEE

T. 070-7510-2016

Attorney specializing in Civil, Divorce, and Administrative Law

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Previous

Dating Sexual Violence | Defense Against a Quasi-Imitative Rape Charge, Concluded With a Suspension of Indictment

Next

Larceny Attorney Assistance Case | Non-Referral for a Client Charged With Larceny and Extortion

View list
Quick Menu

Chat