Deals & Cases

Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act
Violation of the Game Industry Promotion ActSuspended sentence

Game Industry Promotion Act | Defending a Client Charged with Violating the Game Industry Act Against a Custodial Sentence

This is a case of assisting a client who was at risk of criminal punishment for violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act. Despite the charge of violating the Game Industry Promotion Act, the firm defended against an actual custodial sentence and obtained a suspended sentence.

1. The Client Who Sought Assistance Regarding a Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act

Client case of violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Daeryun Law Firm


This is the account of a client who requested assistance for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act.

The client was a self-employed person who ran a small internet café in a small provincial city.

The client initially worked as an ordinary employee at that internet café, and upon a proposal from the existing operator he took over the business and personally ran the internet café for a little over a month.

The problem was that the rating classification issue for some of the game products provided at the internet café from before had not been resolved, and the client continued the business as before, having taken over the operation without sufficiently checking that issue.

As a result, the client was caught in a police crackdown on suspicion of providing, for cash and to an unspecified number of customers, game products that had not received a rating classification and game products differing from the content for which a rating classification had been received.

This violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act is a representative example of a case in which a person may be subject to criminal punishment for being caught in a crackdown after continuing a business without properly recognizing its illegality, even where the person did not intentionally and directly operate an illegal game arcade.

In particular, because even a small subsistence-type internet café or a part-time employee can become a subject of investigation, an early response is very important.

For the client who requested assistance, an attorney experienced in numerous game industry law matters formed a task force team and responded immediately.

What Is the Game Industry Act?

The Game Industry Promotion Act is a statute enacted for the purpose of the sound distribution of game products, the protection of juveniles, and the sound development of the game industry.

The 🔗Game Industry Act strictly prohibits the act of distributing or providing a game product that has not received a rating classification, or providing a game product different from the content for which a rating classification was received.

A person who provides an unapproved game product may be subject to imprisonment for not more than one year or a fine not exceeding 10 million won.

In addition, a person who allows a game product to be used for gambling or fraudulent acts, or who provides speculativeness by offering prizes and the like, may be subject to imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine not exceeding 50 million won.


Representative examples of violations of the Game Industry Act are as follows.

▶Distribution or provision of game products without rating classification approval
▶Provision and encouragement of speculative game products
▶Illegal exchange acts
▶Operation of unlicensed or illegal game arcades
▶Unauthorized modification and distribution of game products

2. Establishing a Strategy to Defend Against the Charge of Violating the Game Industry Promotion Act

Suspended sentence judgment after assistance with the charge of violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act


The firm set about establishing a defense strategy for the client charged with violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act.

The attorney in charge analyzed from multiple angles the gravity of the matter, the scale of the business, the degree of participation in the crime, and the attitude after the crackdown.

Defense Against a Game Industry Act Violation 1. Highlighting Admission of the Facts and a Sincere Attitude of Remorse

The client acknowledged all of the alleged facts in the early stages of the investigation and showed an attitude of remorse for the wrongdoing.

In particular, immediately after the crackdown, the client ceased operations at once, terminated the lease for the internet cafe, and then took up a new job, making efforts to prevent reoffending.

The attorney in charge emphasized that the client had acknowledged the facts from the early stages of the investigation and was sincerely remorseful, and requested leniency.

Defense Against a Game Industry Act Violation 2. Demonstrating the Small Scale of the Business and the Brevity of Its Operation

The internet cafe that the client operated was very small in scale, with few computers installed, and was a small-scale business.

The period during which the client operated it as a business owner was also only about three months, and the actual profits were extremely small.

Most of the revenue was used up on staff wages, rent, and utility charges, and the actual profit the client obtained was very slight.

The attorney in charge emphasized that this was not a habitual or organized crime and requested leniency.

Defense Against a Game Industry Act Violation 3. Emphasizing the Minor Degree of Involvement as an Employee

During the period of working as an employee, the client in fact merely performed the role of managing the computers and charging game money under the direction of the existing operator.

The responsible attorney emphasized that the client merely performed his duties under the direction of the operator and was not aware that it constituted a crime.

3. Defense Against a Custodial Sentence Despite the Charge of Violating the Game Industry Promotion Act

The client who requested help for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act received a suspended sentence and was able to avert an actual custodial sentence.

The court rendered this judgment, taking into account that the defendant acknowledged the offense and showed a reflective attitude, that the concern of reoffending appeared low, and that the profit actually obtained was not large.

Why a Specialist Attorney's Assistance May Be Needed for a Game Industry Act Violation

The punishment in a Game Industry Promotion Act violation case is not determined solely by whether illegal games were provided.

Various factors are comprehensively considered, such as the circumstances of the violation, the scale of operation, the profit structure, the suspect's level of awareness, and efforts to prevent recidivism, and if these circumstances cannot be persuasively explained to the investigative authorities and the court, excessive criminal punishment may result.

Drawing on the experience and know-how accumulated in handling Game Industry Promotion Act violation cases, Daeryun Law Firm provides defense strategies tailored to the client's situation.

The firm also operates branch offices in each region nationwide, maintains a 24-hour emergency consultation system 365 days a year, and provides a tailored video consultation service for clients who find it difficult to visit in person.

Anytime and anywhere, we recommend that you receive the assistance of the 🔗entertainment attorney at Daeryun, Korea's ninth-largest law firm (based on the 2025 value-added tax filings with the National Tax Service).

게임산업진흥에관한법률 | 게임산업법 위반 혐의 의뢰인 도와 실형 방어

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney YoungHeum KIM

YoungHeum KIM

T. 070-5221-2387

Experience as a prosecutor at the Busan High Prosecutors' Office and chief prosecutor at the Seoul Western District Prosecutors' Office

Attorney InWon KIM

InWon KIM

T. 070-7510-1044

Experience as Chief Prosecutor of Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office and Chief Prosecutor of Daejeon Hongseong Branch

Attorney Hyo Chul JEON

Hyo Chul JEON

T. 070-5221-2387

Career as Chairman of the Sports Fair Committee

Attorney MinKyeong KWON

MinKyeong KWON

T. 070-5221-2387

sports lawyer

Attorney GiJun LEE

GiJun LEE

T. 070-5221-3616

entertainment lawyer

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Defamation Complaint Filing | Case Concluded with a Minor Fine Despite Receiving a Defamation Complaint

Next

Attempted Rape | Suspended Sentence Despite Charges of Attempted Rape and Unlawful Confinement

View list
Quick Menu

Chat