[Anyang Drunk Driving Attorney Resolved Case] Drunk Driving Attorney Defends a Drunk Driving Case to a Minor Fine

The client who consulted the Anyang drunk driving attorney was an office worker.

The client's grandmother, who lived with the client, asked the client, who was leaving for work, to buy daily necessities.

After finishing work, the client attended a company dinner.

After drinking at the dinner, as the client was about to call a substitute driver, the client recalled the grandmother's request.

To keep the promise to the grandmother, the client drove the personal vehicle in which the daily necessities had been stored.

While driving, the client was caught by police conducting a drunk driving crackdown, which placed the client at risk of punishment.

■ Laws related to the case explained by the Anyang drunk driving attorney

※ Where a repeat offense occurs within 10 years : Where a person who has been sentenced to a fine or heavier and whose sentence has become final commits a repeat drunk driving offense within 10 years from the date the sentence became final (including a person whose sentence has lapsed), drunk driving punishment is imposed according to the following categories.

▶Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act (Prohibition of Driving While Intoxicated)

The standard for the intoxicated state in which driving is prohibited is a driver's blood alcohol concentration of 0.03 percent or higher.

▶Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act (Penalty Provisions)

The Anyang drunk driving attorney argued that the client was deeply reflecting on and regretting having driven under the influence.

In a rush to deliver daily necessities for the grandmother, the client made a mistake.

The Anyang drunk driving attorney argued that the client felt regret and remorse over the drunk driving and had prepared a written statement of reflection.

The Anyang drunk driving attorney argued that the client had a family to support.

The client had a grandmother in poor health and a child, who relied on the client for their livelihood.

The Anyang drunk driving attorney argued that, if the client were punished, the client would be unable to support the family, making their livelihood difficult.

The Anyang drunk driving attorney noted that the distance the client drove the personal vehicle after drinking was less than 1 km.

The client's home and workplace were not far apart, and the client used the personal vehicle in order to carry the daily necessities.

The Anyang drunk driving attorney argued that, although the client did drive under the influence, the court should take into account that the distance driven after drinking was short.

The Anyang drunk driving attorney provided diligent assistance to reduce the client's sentence, and the client received only a fine rather than an actual prison sentence for the drunk driving.

Drunk driving is an offense that can occur in daily life through a moment of carelessness.

Daeryun Law Firm has attorneys who handle drunk driving cases to address such drunk driving charges.

If you have a situation similar to the client above, you may consult an Anyang drunk driving attorney at Daeryun Law Firm.