Case Analysis / Legal Updates

Riding Along with a Drunk Driver | A District Court Judgment Holding That the Charge of Aiding and Abetting Drunk Driving Cannot Apply Where the Passenger Did Not Know the Driver Had Been Drinking

This is an analysis of a district court judgment holding that, where a person rode along in a vehicle without knowing that the driver had been drinking, the charge of aiding and abetting drunk driving cannot be applied.

1. Riding Along with a Drunk Driver, the Detailed Circumstances

The detailed circumstances of the trial concerning the punishment of a passenger who rode along with a drunk driver are as follows.

After drinking at a gathering with friends, A drove the taxi he operates with B and C aboard.

At the time, A's blood alcohol concentration was 0.045%, which clearly constituted drunk driving, and while in that state he repeatedly sped and violated traffic signals, eventually being caught by the police.

Accordingly, B and C were charged with aiding and abetting drunk driving on the suspicion that they had known of A's drunk driving yet allowed it to continue.

Riding Along with a Drunk Driver, the Relevant Statutes

The provisions punishing those who ride along with a drunk driver have been in force since 2016. The point is that punishment is not limited to the person actually operating the vehicle; a person who knew the driver had been drinking yet left the matter alone may also bear responsibility.

🔗Riding Along with a Drunk Driver is subject to the crime of aiding and abetting under the Criminal Act.

“Aiding and abetting” refers to making another person's criminal act easier, even without directly committing the offense oneself.

Accordingly, not only the drunk driver but also a person who facilitated or encouraged the conduct cannot avoid punishment.

▣ Article 32 of the Criminal Act (Accessories)

(1) A person who aids and abets the commission of a crime by another shall be punished as an accessory.

(2) The punishment of an accessory shall be mitigated below that of the principal offender.

The cases that may constitute aiding and abetting drunk driving are as follows.

✓ Riding along while knowing that the driver was intoxicated

✓ Inducing or conspiring in the drunk driving

✓ Directly handing over the car keys

✓ Aiding and abetting the drunk driving of a subordinate employee

✓ Encouraging or selling alcohol at a place where designated-driver service is unavailable

✓ Providing alcohol even though drunk driving was sufficiently foreseeable

🔗Punishment of a Passenger Who Rode Along with a Drunk Driver varies in severity depending on the passenger's conduct.

✓ Where the passenger actively assisted

Where a passenger in a drunk-driving vehicle actively urged or encouraged the driver's drunk driving, the passenger faces imprisonment for up to three years or a fine of up to 10 million won.

✓ Where it amounts to mere aiding and abetting

Even without having encouraged the drunk driving, if the passenger knew that the driver was intoxicated, the passenger faces imprisonment for up to one year and six months or a fine of up to 5 million won.

2. Riding Along with a Drunk Driver, the Court's Determination

In the trial concerning riding along with a drunk driver, the district court imposed a fine of 2 million won on B, while it acquitted A.

The reasons the two judgments diverged are as follows.

At the time of the incident, A had drunk three to four bottles of soju and was in a state of insensibility, and he boarded the taxi while being led by C. The court confirmed that, even after boarding the taxi, A had not been aware that C was driving while intoxicated.

By contrast, it came to light that B had been seated in the front passenger seat and had even responded to C's reckless driving with laughter and approval.

The court held, “Because A, in a heavily intoxicated state at the time of the incident, committed no act of assisting or aiding and abetting C's drunk driving, the intent to aid and abet was not proven.”

3. Riding Along with a Drunk Driver, Daeryun's Strategy

In the case of riding along with a drunk driver, if a person rode along in the vehicle while knowing that the driver had been drinking, this clearly constitutes the crime of aiding and abetting drunk driving.

However, as in the case above, where the passenger was entirely unaware that the driver was intoxicated, an acquittal may be obtained.

That said, because the scope for recognizing the crime of aiding and abetting drunk driving is broad, rather than relying on emotional appeals and responses, it is important to obtain the assistance of an attorney experienced in such matters and to gather and submit objective evidence that the passenger did not know about the drinking.

The 🔗Drunk Driving and Traffic Accident Response Group of Daeryun Law Firm LLP works together with the Evidence Investigation Group and the Consultation Group to help clients facing similar cases respond in a systematic legal manner, so you are welcome to request a legal consultation at any time.

▶ A Case in Which a Client Charged with Aiding and Abetting Drunk Driving Obtained a ‘Non-Disposition’ (a Korean juvenile-court decision imposing no protective disposition)

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney JaeBong JEONG

JaeBong JEONG

T. 070-7510-1820

Experience as chief prosecutor at Uijeongbu District Prosecutors’ Office and chief prosecutor at Busan District Prosecutors’ Office

Attorney Cheol Kim

Cheol Kim

T. 070-5117-3709

Experience as Chief Prosecutor of Busan District Prosecutors’ Office and Chief Prosecutor of Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office

Attorney HyeonSu KIM

HyeonSu KIM

T. 070-7510-2018

Daegu Metropolitan Police Agency Seongseo Police Station Inspector Experience

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Citizen Participation Trial | Analysis of a Supreme Court Decision Holding That Additional Examination of Evidence Must Be Conducted Cautiously Where the Jurors Returned a Unanimous Verdict of Acquittal

Next

Crime of Child Abuse Homicide | Analysis of the Supreme Court's Judgment on the Offender's Dolus Eventualis in a Child Abuse Homicide Case

View list
Quick Menu

Chat