Case Analysis / Legal Updates
Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act | Analysis of an Administrative Court Judgment Holding That a Truck Owner-Operator Paid Freight Charges Based on Performance Is Also Eligible for Industrial Accident Insurance Benefits
This analysis examines an Administrative Court judgment holding that, under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, industrial accident insurance benefits should be paid where a truck owner-operator who received freight transport requests from a logistics company suffered an occupational injury.
1. Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, the Detailed Circumstances?
A, the plaintiff who filed the lawsuit concerning the payment under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, had regularly received freight transport requests from logistics company B and had been paid freight charges based on performance.
During that time, A was injured in an accident in which a forklift at the factory receiving the delivered freight struck A's left ankle, and A applied to the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service for medical care benefits, asserting that this constituted an occupational injury.
However, the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service denied the application for medical care benefits, reasoning that “A, as an owner-operator* who substantially owns the truck at issue, was not enrolled in the four major insurances, bore the risk of profit and loss according to the volume of transport on A's own account, and does not qualify as a worker in a special type of employment*.”
A then filed a lawsuit.
*Owner-operator: a worker in a special type of employment who purchases a vehicle, obtains a commercial license plate (yellow) of a transport company, and works under it.
*Worker in a special type of employment: a worker who works under a contract with a business owner but earns income according to the amount of work performed rather than a fixed monthly salary. Examples include delivery drivers, insurance planners, study-materials tutors, and door-to-door salespersons.
Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, the Relevant Statutes?
🔗An industrial accident refers to the death, injury, or contraction of a disease of a worker caused by structures, facilities, raw materials, gas, vapor, dust, or the like related to the work, or arising from the work or other duties.
"Sanjae Boheombeop" is the abbreviated name of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, a law whose purpose is to contribute to the protection of workers by carrying out projects for the promotion of workers' welfare, including the prompt and fair compensation of workers' occupational injuries.
Whether a person qualifies as a worker under the Labor Standards Act must be determined according to whether, in substance, the relationship of providing labor is one in which the labor provider provided labor to the employer in a subordinate relationship at a business or workplace for the purpose of wages.
Here, whether a ‘subordinate relationship’ exists is determined by considering, among others, the following points.
① Whether the employer determines the content of the work, the worker is subject to rules of employment or service regulations, and the employer exercises substantial direction and supervision in the course of performing the work
② Whether the employer designates the working hours and the place of work, and the labor provider is bound by them
③ Whether the labor provider can independently operate a business on the provider's own account, such as by owning equipment, raw materials, or work tools, or by employing a third party to perform the work on the provider's behalf
④ Whether the labor provider bears risks such as the generation of profit and the incurrence of loss through the provision of labor
⑤ Whether the nature of the remuneration is that of consideration for the labor itself
2. Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, the Court's Determination?
The Administrative Court, which heard the lawsuit that A filed against the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering that “the disposition denying the medical care benefits be revoked.”
The court noted that “most of A's transport work was requested by B, and A was paid the freight charges calculated by B according to the volume of transport assessed for that work, the transport time, and the like.”
It went on to emphasize that “A performed most of the work for B, and the remuneration received from B can be regarded only as consideration for the provision of labor relating to the transport work that A provided, or as performance-based remuneration.”
On this basis, the court determined that “A is recognized as having provided labor under B's direction and supervision for the purpose of wages, and can be assessed as having been effectively exclusively bound to B,” holding that A should be regarded as a worker under the Labor Standards Act, and thereby granted the plaintiff's claim seeking revocation of the disposition denying the medical care benefits.
3. Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, Daeryun's Strategy?
This analysis has examined an Administrative Court judgment holding that, under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, industrial accident insurance benefits should be paid where a truck owner-operator who was performing freight transport work at the request of a logistics company suffered an occupational injury.
A lawsuit under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act is a complex proceeding conducted against a state agency or a company on the basis of statutory provisions, so it is often difficult for an individual to approach.
In particular, a clear causal relationship between the work and the accident must be established, and this process can feel very difficult without the help of a professional.
If you are preparing a lawsuit relating to an industrial accident, receiving the advice of an attorney experienced in such matters can be of considerable value.
At Daeryun Law Firm LLP, the 🔗attorneys handling labor and industrial accident matters are attorneys with extensive experience in industrial accident litigation who actively assist clients in protecting their interests and obtaining compensation for their losses.
If you are facing difficulties in a similar situation, you are welcome to reach out to Daeryun at any time.
Related Information
Explore legal information related to this case.
Response Procedures for a Worker Fatality and a Corporate Checklist
Criteria for Recognizing Occupational Disease, and How Employers Should Respond
Nuclear Power Plant Contract Awards | A Large-Scale Strategic Project Drawing Together National Industrial Capacity and Diplomatic Strength
Daeryun's Key Strengths

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology
More than 240 key members
1,200+ cases handled per month
* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)
more strengths
Book a legal
consultation with an attorney
All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.
Phone consultation
1800-7905
Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year


Online consultation
We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation
KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys
Related Members
View more
Naewon Kwak
T. 070-5117-2950
Seoul Central District Court judge, Seoul Administrative Court judge experience

Jong Hun HAN
T. 070-7510-2016
Experience as a public interest member of the Gyeongnam Regional Labor Relations Commission
Related Practice Areas
View moreConsult in other languages
Popular Columns
View moreCriteria for Determining Workplace Harassment: Legal Elements and an Analysis of Precedents

Reporting Unpaid Wages: Guidance on the Reporting Procedure and the Documents to Prepare When Wages Have Gone Unpaid

Fine for Failure to Prepare an Employment Contract, Administrative Fines, and How to Respond

Examples, How to Report, and the Level of Punishment

Cases of Verbal Abuse in the Workplace, Legal Response Procedures, and Methods of Gathering Evidence

Previous
Obstruction of Official Duties | Analysis of a Supreme Court Decision Holding That Pushing a Police Officer Without Justifiable Reason Constitutes Obstruction of Official Duties
Next
Administrative Appeal and Administrative Litigation | Analysis of an Administrative Court Judgment Holding That the Recovery of Insurance Benefits on the Ground of a Speed-Limit Violation Was Improper
View listDo you have more questions?












