Case Analysis / Legal Updates
Serious Accidents Punishment Act | A Fine Imposed in the First Case Charged Under the Serious Accidents Punishment Act in Chungbuk
As the Serious Accidents Punishment Act (a 2022 Korean statute imposing criminal liability on business operators for serious safety accidents, with no direct common-law equivalent) has recently been extended to apply even to workplaces with fewer than 50 employees, a fine was imposed on a company representative in Chungbuk for the first time on charges of violating the Serious Accidents Punishment Act.
1. Serious Accidents Punishment Act, the Detailed Circumstances
The circumstances under which the trial concerning the Serious Accidents Punishment Act was held are as follows.
At a factory in Chungbuk, A, the representative of a subcontractor, caused a crane wireless controller to malfunction, and a subcontractor worker in his seventies was caught in the machinery and died.
As a result of this accident, the representative and the corporation of the prime contractor, two members of its safety management team, and the representative of the subcontractor were indicted on charges of violating the Serious Accidents Punishment Act (industrial accident causing death) and violating the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
This accident occurred less than a month after the Serious Accidents Punishment Act took effect, and it is the first case of indictment for a serious accident in Chungbuk.
The prosecution pointed out that, although the prime contractor had formed a team to prevent serious accidents, five of the team's six members held other concurrent duties, so it was difficult to regard the team as a substantive “dedicated organization,” and that the company had failed to fulfill its safety obligations, including by not properly conducting risk assessments during the work process.
The defendants countered that the deceased worker had ordinarily used a path other than the designated entrance, and that A, the subcontractor's representative who caused the accident, had caused the wireless controller to malfunction, so this was an accident that occurred under unusual circumstances, and that they had sufficiently fulfilled their safety obligations.
Serious Accidents Punishment Act, the Relevant Legislation
🔗The Serious Accidents Punishment Act is a law enacted to protect the safety and health of workers from accidents that occur in the workplace.
Under this Act, when a serious accident occurs, safety and health obligations are imposed on the managing officer; the joint penalty provisions apply not only to the offender and the person responsible for safety but also to the corporation; and punitive damages liability is imposed on the business owner as well.
Recently, this Act has been extended to apply to workplaces with fewer than 50 employees as well.
▣ Article 2 of the Act on the Punishment of Serious Accidents, etc. (Definitions) 2. The term “serious industrial accident” means an industrial accident, among those under Article 2, subparagraph 1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, that has caused any of the following results:
(a) One or more deaths; (b) Two or more injured persons requiring treatment for six months or more as a result of the same accident; (c) Three or more persons with an occupational disease prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as acute poisoning from the same harmful factor, occurring within one year. |
2. Serious Accidents Punishment Act, the Court's Determination
The court that heard the trial concerning the Serious Accidents Punishment Act did not accept A's assertion that he had fulfilled his safety obligations.
The court found that A had been negligent in preventing safety accidents, including by failing to properly conduct risk assessments.
Emphasizing the purpose of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act, the court explained, “it is necessary to hold managing officers strictly accountable in order to prevent accidents from recurring in the workplace.” The court, however, determined the sentences in consideration of the fact that the defendants had reached a settlement with the bereaved family and had worked to fulfill their safety obligations after the accident.
Accordingly, the court imposed a fine of 30 million won on the representative of the prime contractor and a fine of 100 million won on the corporation, and it imposed suspended sentences (a suspended sentence under Korean law, broadly comparable to a suspended sentence or probation in common-law systems, under which the conviction loses its effect once the suspension period passes without incident) of imprisonment with labor and imprisonment without labor, respectively, on the two members of the prime contractor's safety management team and the representative of the subcontractor.
3. Serious Accidents Punishment Act, Daeryun's Strategy
This is a district court judgment that imposed a fine on a company representative charged for the first time in Chungbuk in connection with the Serious Accidents Punishment Act, and it can be regarded as a significant case at a time when the application of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act is gaining momentum.
The Serious Accidents Punishment Act is a system that took effect on January 27, 2022.
After its enactment, a worker died at a quarry in 2022, giving rise to the first case investigated for a violation of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act.
Subsequently, a mass toxic-infection incident in the Busan area became the first case of indictment under the Serious Accidents Punishment Act, and recently, in 2024, the first case of detention under the Serious Accidents Punishment Act was announced, so the cases applying the Serious Accidents Punishment Act are increasing.
Accordingly, business owners should thoroughly familiarize themselves with the contents of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act and work to prevent accidents through periodic legal advice.
The Serious Accidents and Industrial Safety Group of Daeryun Law Firm LLP, through attorneys experienced in industrial accident matters, provides legal advisory services on the fulfillment of safety and protective obligations for clients' workplaces, so if you would like a consultation, you are welcome to visit Daeryun.
Related Information
Explore legal information related to this case.
Procedures and Strategies Companies Should Know When Responding to Industrial Accidents
Labor Consultation: A Corporate Attorney Explains the Corporate Response Strategy When an Industrial Accident Occurs at a Staffing Agency
Major Amendments to the Rules on Occupational Safety and Health Standards and Response Strategies
Daeryun's Key Strengths

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology
More than 240 key members
1,200+ cases handled per month
* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)
more strengths
Book a legal
consultation with an attorney
All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.
Phone consultation
1800-7905
Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year


Online consultation
We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation
KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys
Related Members
View moreRelated Practice Areas
View moreConsult in other languages
Popular Columns
View moreHow to Calculate Industrial Accident Insurance Premiums and Premium Rates by Business Type

Enforcement Decree of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act: Key Provisions, Application Criteria, and Employers' Obligations

The Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act: Scope of Application and How to Respond to Violations

Serious Accidents Frequently Occurring in the Construction Industry, Explained by an Attorney Experienced in Construction Matters

Industrial Accident Processing Standards: Amendments, Determination of Application, Procedures, and How to Respond

Previous
Narcotics Control Act | Suspended Sentence Imposed in Light of the Motive of a Defendant Who Underwent Endoscopy 33 Times to Be Administered Propofol
Next
Suspect Interrogation Protocol | Analysis of a Supreme Court Decision Holding That a Suspect Interrogation Protocol Not Consented to by the Defendant Cannot Be Used as Evidence
View listDo you have more questions?












