Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Acquisitions Due Diligence

Your company has agreed on a price in principle for a target, and the seller wants to sign quickly. Acquisitions due diligence is how you decide whether that price, and the deal structure, still make sense once you see inside the business.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Acquisitions Due Diligence: what usually happens

Sizing the review to the deal

Not every acquisition needs the same depth of review. Buying a competitor raises antitrust and employee questions, acquiring a business with regulated licenses raises transfer and approval questions, and buying a technology company turns attention to who owns the code and data. Defining the scope early, around the issues that would actually change your decision, keeps diligence focused and its cost under control. The seller's timetable should not dictate the scope, although a realistic plan helps keep the deal on track. Buyers entering a regulated industry should ask early whether any approval is needed before closing, since that can set the timetable for everything else.

Findings that change the deal

Diligence findings usually lead to a price change, a specific indemnity or escrow, a closing condition, a different structure, or occasionally a decision to walk away. A customer contract with a change-of-control clause may need consent before closing. Unpaid taxes or misclassified workers may push a buyer toward an asset purchase or a special indemnity. Pending litigation may need to be valued or carved out. If representations and warranties insurance is part of the deal, the insurer will review the diligence and may exclude known issues, so problems that turn up have to be handled in the agreement rather than left to the policy. Findings that cannot be priced or fixed are worth raising with your board or investors before signing rather than after.

Planning past the closing date

Diligence also feeds the integration plan: which contracts need notices or consents, which licenses and permits must be transferred or reissued, which employees are key, and which systems must be connected. Starting that list during diligence avoids surprises after closing. Useful starting materials are the letter of intent, the data room index, and your internal goals for the acquisition. With those, we agree on the scope of review, the team, and the timetable, and flag the issues most likely to affect signing.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about acquisitions due diligence and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.