Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Activism Defense

Shareholder activism rarely starts with a press release. It usually starts with a quiet stake, a private letter to the board, or a request for a call with the CEO, and the company's early response shapes much of what follows.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Activism Defense: what usually happens

What draws an activist's attention

Activists usually look for a gap between how a company is performing and how they believe it could perform, such as a lagging share price, idle cash, or a business line they think should be sold. Some campaigns are about strategy or capital allocation, while others focus on board composition, executive pay, or a pending deal. A company that has never reviewed its own vulnerabilities from an investor's point of view is often surprised by what an activist highlights. Activism defense starts with that review, done quietly and well before anyone is at the door. It includes a look at the shareholder base and how it has been changing.

Governance documents and proxy contest rules

Bylaws, the charter, and board practices set the ground rules for a contest. Advance notice provisions, the ability of shareholders to call meetings or act by written consent, and the structure of the board all affect timing and leverage. Since the federal universal proxy rules took effect, shareholders in a contested director election at a public company can vote for a mix of company and dissident nominees on a single card, which has changed how contests are run. Courts have scrutinized defensive measures adopted in reaction to a specific campaign, so changes are better made with care and on a clean record. Securities disclosure obligations apply on both sides, including for investors who cross ownership thresholds.

Responding once a campaign begins

When an activist reaches out, the board's first job is to understand what is being asked rather than to fire back. Management and directors should agree on who speaks for the company, and private communications should be treated as if they may one day be quoted. We help boards assess the proposal on its merits, weigh whether engagement or a settlement such as adding directors makes sense, and prepare for a public contest if one comes. Fiduciary duties run through all of it, because a response that protects incumbents rather than the company invites challenge. The goal is a decision the board can explain to shareholders, not only a tactic that ends the campaign.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

04 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about activism defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.