Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Aerospace Antitrust Litigation

A parts maker learns that a major manufacturer will no longer license the data it needs to service an engine, or an engineer hears that contractors agreed not to hire from each other. In an industry with few buyers and few suppliers, these disputes can quickly take an antitrust form.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Aerospace Antitrust Litigation: what usually happens

Why the industry produces these disputes

Aerospace and defense markets are concentrated, qualification of parts is slow and costly, and long-term sole-source arrangements are common, so a single company's decisions can shape who is able to compete. Aerospace antitrust litigation often involves the aftermarket, where independent repair shops and parts makers allege that a manufacturer used warranties, licensing terms, or access to technical data to keep them out. Labor markets are another recurring theme, because agreements among companies not to recruit each other's engineers have drawn both private suits and government prosecution. Mergers among suppliers draw close review from the antitrust agencies and sometimes from the Department of Defense. Teaming arrangements for government bids are generally lawful, but they can raise questions when they look more like an agreement not to compete than a joint effort.

Records that tend to matter

If you believe you have been excluded, keep the correspondence in which access was refused or terms changed, along with lost bids, cancelled orders, and customer statements explaining why they could not buy from you. Gather the licensing agreements, supply contracts, and certification records that show what you needed and when. If your company may be a defendant, put a litigation hold in place covering email, messaging apps, and the files of the people who negotiated supply, pricing, or hiring arrangements. Export control and classified information rules can complicate how documents are collected and shared, so plan that with counsel rather than gathering files informally. Do not discuss the dispute with competitors directly.

Framing the matter at the start

We first consider whether the conduct fits an antitrust theory, or whether contract, trade secret, or procurement law offers a more direct path. Industry structure is central, so defining the relevant market for a specific part, service, or labor pool is usually an early and contested question. We discuss whether a government agency is already looking at the conduct, which can affect timing and strategy. We also look at contract terms that may require arbitration or limit remedies. These cases rely heavily on industry knowledge and economic analysis, and we plan for that from the beginning.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about aerospace antitrust litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.