Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Anti Money Laundering Compliance Program

A bank partner asks to see your AML policies before it will sign, an examiner schedules a visit, or a new payments product is about to launch and nobody is sure which rules apply.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Anti Money Laundering Compliance Program: what usually happens

Who needs one and what it is for

Under the Bank Secrecy Act, banks, money services businesses, broker-dealers, casinos, and certain other businesses must maintain an anti money laundering program, and many fintech and crypto companies fall into these categories even when they do not think of themselves as financial institutions. The program is meant to be risk-based, built around the company's own customers, products, and geography rather than copied from a template. Regulators look at whether it works in practice, including how suspicious activity is identified and reported. New York's financial regulator adds its own monitoring and certification requirements for institutions it supervises. Federal rules for some types of firms have been adopted and then delayed, so their current status needs checking.

Where programs tend to fall short

A common weakness is a written policy that does not match how the business really operates. Others include a monitoring system whose alerts pile up unreviewed, customer due diligence that stops at onboarding, thin documentation of why alerts were closed, and a compliance officer without enough authority or staff. Before an exam or a partner review, gather the current policies, the risk assessment, recent independent testing reports, training records, and samples of how alerts and suspicious activity reports were handled. Suspicious activity reports are confidential, and disclosing their existence outside permitted channels is itself a violation.

Starting point for a review

An AML program review begins with the business model and which regulators and rules actually apply, then compares the written program with how the operation runs day to day. Where gaps exist, the priority is usually to fix the largest risks first and to document the remediation as it happens. If there is already a regulatory finding or a bank partner's demand, we review it closely and help set a realistic timeline for the response. We also talk about who inside the company owns the program going forward and how often it should be tested.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about anti money laundering compliance program and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.