Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocationsGo to integrated search
Go to integrated search
Corporate

Antitrust Case

Your company has been named in an antitrust case, served with a subpoena in someone else's, or is weighing whether to bring one against a supplier or rival. The path ahead tends to be long, document-heavy, and driven by economics.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Antitrust Case: what usually happens

How these cases unfold

An antitrust case usually begins with a complaint that has to describe a plausible agreement or exclusionary conduct, not just parallel behavior, and early motions often test that point. If the case survives, discovery can be broad, reaching emails, chat messages, pricing data, and board materials across several years. Many private cases are filed as class actions on behalf of direct or indirect purchasers, and whether a class is certified can change the economics of the case for both sides. Government investigations sometimes run in parallel, and a guilty plea or consent order in that track can feed the private litigation. Settlement can come at almost any stage.

Preparing the company for discovery

Once a case is filed or reasonably expected, issue a litigation hold that covers personal devices and messaging apps used for work, not only company email. Identify the employees who dealt with the competitors, customers, or practices at issue, and collect their files before memories and data fade. Sales and pricing databases may need to be exported in a usable form for economists. If you received a subpoena as a third party, you still have obligations, but you can usually negotiate scope and protect confidential information through a protective order. Avoid internal discussion of the merits outside privileged channels.

Planning strategy and cost early

Antitrust litigation is among the more expensive kinds of commercial litigation, largely because of discovery and economic analysis, so we talk about budget and decision points from the start. We assess whether motions can narrow the claims, which economists should be retained, and how the case interacts with any government inquiry or foreign proceeding. For plaintiffs, we consider whether to sue individually, join a class, or opt out of one, and how long the claim has been accruing. For defendants, we look at insurance, indemnity from co-defendants or suppliers, and the business relationships the case puts at stake.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about antitrust case and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.