Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Labor & Employment

Arbitration in Employment Contracts

The arbitration clause sits near the end of an offer letter, or a new version arrived with a bonus plan you were asked to sign. Arbitration in employment contracts is usually read closely only once a dispute exists, which is late.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Arbitration in Employment Contracts: what usually happens

Reading the clause itself

Arbitration provisions vary more than people expect. Some cover every dispute connected to the job, while others carve out particular matters, such as requests for emergency court orders, and claims for unemployment or workers' compensation benefits generally run through their own agencies regardless. Many include a waiver of class or collective actions, and many hand the question of whether a dispute must be arbitrated to the arbitrator rather than a judge. It also helps to see which provider and rules are named, who pays the fees, and whether the employer reserved the right to change the terms on its own.

Federal law and New York's limits

The Federal Arbitration Act generally supports enforcing these agreements, and it shapes how far state law can restrict them. New York passed a law limiting mandatory arbitration of discrimination claims, but courts have largely held that it gives way where the federal act applies. A separate federal statute lets a person with a sexual harassment or sexual assault claim choose court despite a signed agreement, and courts are still defining how it affects other claims filed alongside. Certain transportation workers fall outside the federal act altogether, which can change the analysis. Because these points are actively litigated, the current case law is worth checking rather than assuming.

For employers drafting, for employees deciding

Employers adopting or revising a clause should think about how it is presented and accepted, whether it is applied consistently across roles and states, and how a large wave of individual claims would be handled under the chosen rules, since mass filings can create heavy fee obligations. Employees asked to sign should check whether an opt-out window exists. Those who already signed should bring the full agreement, any later amendments, and the handbook acknowledgment to a first meeting. We look at whether the clause reaches the claim at issue, whether it was formed in a way that holds up, and what arbitration would mean for timing, cost, and privacy.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about arbitration in employment contracts and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.