Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Blockchain Defense

A token project receives a subpoena, a crypto exchange gets an inquiry from a state regulator, or a developer learns that prosecutors are looking at software they wrote. Blockchain defense starts with identifying which authority is asking and on what theory.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Blockchain Defense: what usually happens

Agencies and theories

Digital asset matters can draw interest from several authorities at once. The SEC may examine whether a token was offered as a security, and the CFTC treats some digital assets as commodities and can pursue fraud or manipulation. Federal prosecutors bring criminal cases, including fraud, money laundering, and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. Virtual currency businesses serving New Yorkers are generally licensed or chartered and supervised by the state Department of Financial Services, and the Attorney General has enforcement tools of its own. Federal policy toward digital assets has shifted significantly, including new stablecoin legislation and changing agency positions, so the current posture needs checking in each matter.

Preserving the technical record

Blockchain matters depend on technical evidence: on-chain transactions, smart contract code and its history, wallet records, internal chats, and public statements in community channels. Much of the on-chain record is permanent, but off-chain messages and servers may not be. A litigation hold should cover messaging platforms and code repositories, and no one should delete accounts, channels, or repositories once an inquiry is anticipated. If systems have been compromised, keep them in their current state and isolate them from the network rather than shutting them down, and get forensic help before going further.

Approaching the defense

Early decisions include whether individuals need separate counsel, whether to engage regulators through a meeting or a written submission, and how to respond to subpoenas that ask for large volumes of data. Questions such as whether a token is a security, or whether a developer actually controlled the funds involved, often shape the case. Public statements by the project or company should be reviewed with the legal strategy in mind. If an exchange has frozen tokens or the government has seized them, the route to seeking their return depends on who acted and on what basis. In our first discussion we identify the authorities involved, the deadlines, and the immediate preservation and communication steps.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about blockchain defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.