Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Bribery Due Diligence

Your company is about to hire a sales agent overseas, sign a distributor, or buy a business that sells to government customers. Someone has asked whether anyone has checked for bribery risk.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Bribery Due Diligence: what usually happens

Why third parties draw the scrutiny

Many foreign bribery cases involve payments routed through intermediaries, so anti-bribery laws such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act place weight on how a company vetted and monitored its agents and partners. Bribery due diligence is the process of finding out who a third party is, who owns it, how it will deal with government officials, and why its compensation makes sense. Warning signs include unusually high commissions, requests to pay accounts in unrelated countries, and resistance to compliance terms. Enforcement priorities in the United States have shifted in recent years, but the statute remains in force, and the period for bringing charges can outlast a change in policy.

Diligence in an acquisition

When buying a company, the acquirer can inherit liability for the target's past misconduct, and continuing a corrupt arrangement after closing creates new exposure. Pre-closing review typically looks at government touchpoints, sales intermediaries, licenses and permits, and the target's own compliance history, though access is often limited before signing. When diligence is incomplete, post-closing review and integration become more important. The Justice Department has policies that can give credit to acquirers who identify and disclose misconduct promptly after a deal and remediate it. Representations, warranties, and indemnities in the purchase agreement can allocate some risk between the parties, but they do not prevent enforcement.

Documenting the review

A diligence file that records what was asked, what was found, and how concerns were resolved is often as important as the conclusion. Questionnaires and database checks are a starting point, but higher-risk relationships may call for interviews, background investigations, and contract protections such as audit rights and termination clauses. If a review uncovers a possible past payment, the next steps involve privilege, potential disclosure, and whether to proceed with the deal, so counsel should be involved before findings are circulated. We help companies scale the diligence to the risk, so that low-risk vendors move quickly and the effort goes where it is needed.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about bribery due diligence and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.