Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Construction Defect Litigation

Water comes through the new roof, a facade cracks within its first few winters, or a condo board learns that the mechanical systems were never built to plan. By then the contractor may have moved on, and everyone points somewhere else.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Construction Defect Litigation: what usually happens

Who ends up in the case

Construction defect litigation rarely involves just two parties. An owner may have claims against the general contractor, who in turn brings in subcontractors, suppliers, and the architect or engineer whose design is questioned. In condominiums, the board often pursues the sponsor or developer, and the offering plan becomes a key document. Each party's insurer is usually involved from early on, and those policies affect how the case is defended and resolved. Contract terms on warranties, limits of liability, notice, and dispute resolution can shape the claims as much as the defect itself, and some contracts send the matter to arbitration.

Before repairs begin

Owners understandably want problems fixed fast, but repairing before conditions are documented can make it harder to prove what was wrong. Photograph and video the damage, keep samples where appropriate, and have a qualified engineer or consultant inspect before demolition, with notice to the contractor where the contract calls for it. Assemble the contract, plans and specifications, change orders, meeting minutes, inspection reports, warranties, and correspondence about the problem. Emergency work to stop ongoing damage is usually reasonable, but keep careful records of what was done and why. Contractors and design professionals should preserve their project files and notify their insurers promptly.

Deadlines can run sooner than expected

In New York, some claims against contractors and design professionals can be measured from completion of the work rather than from the moment a defect is noticed, so waiting to see whether a problem gets worse can be costly. Our initial review maps the contract chain and checks which deadlines may apply, whether contractual notice or cure steps have been triggered, and whether the defect points toward litigation, arbitration, or a negotiated repair. We also discuss the role of technical consultants, since these cases usually depend on them. If you are a contractor facing a claim, we start with your insurance tender and your own subcontracts.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about construction defect litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.