Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Corruption Compliance

The company is entering a market where licenses, customs clearance, and public tenders all run through officials, and the board asks whether its policies would hold up if something went wrong.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Corruption Compliance: what usually happens

Starting with the risk, not the policy

A corruption compliance program works when it is built around the company's real exposure: the countries where it operates, the government touchpoints in its business, and the third parties who act for it. Customs brokers, licensing consultants, and sales agents are frequent sources of risk because they deal with officials on the company's behalf. State-owned enterprises count as well, since their employees may be treated as government officials under anti-bribery laws. For companies whose securities trade on US exchanges, the accounting provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act also require accurate books and adequate internal controls, so vaguely described payments can become a problem even without proof of a bribe.

Where programs tend to fall short

Policies on paper often outpace practice. Gifts and hospitality rules may exist but go unenforced, due diligence on intermediaries may stop after onboarding, and expense approvals may not catch payments with vague descriptions. Training that is not tied to people's actual roles fades quickly. Prosecutors evaluating a company's program have published guidance asking whether it is well designed, adequately resourced, and working in practice, and they look at whether the company tests its own controls. Collect current policies, lists of third parties, diligence files, hotline reports, and audit results to see where the gaps lie.

Building or reviewing the program

We begin with a risk assessment that maps where the company meets government officials and through whom. Policies, approval paths, and monitoring can then be fitted to that map rather than adopted from a template. If a specific concern has already arisen, it should be handled through a privileged review rather than folded into a general program update. Decisions about remediation, discipline, and any disclosure to authorities depend on the facts, current enforcement policy, and the laws of other countries that may apply. The goal is a program people use and the company can explain when asked.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about corruption compliance and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.