Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Criminal Antitrust

An agent shows up at an employee's door, or a grand jury subpoena arrives asking for years of pricing emails and calendars. In a criminal antitrust matter, the first days often shape what follows more than anything later.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Criminal Antitrust: what usually happens

What turns a competition issue into a crime

Most antitrust questions are civil. The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice reserves criminal prosecution mainly for agreements between competitors that are treated as unlawful on their face, with price fixing and bid rigging as the classic examples. Both companies and individual employees can be charged, and executives located outside the United States are not out of reach. Criminal investigations often run alongside civil class actions brought by purchasers, so what a company says and produces in one setting tends to matter in the other. Some states also have criminal antitrust laws of their own, and state attorneys general may be investigating the same conduct.

The first decisions

Once a company learns of potential cartel conduct, timing can matter a great deal. The Antitrust Division runs a leniency program that offers significant benefits to a company that reports qualifying conduct first and cooperates fully, and the program's conditions are strict. Whether to approach the government, and when, is a judgment that needs a close look at the facts. Preservation should begin right away: suspend routine deletion, secure phones and messaging apps that employees use for work, and avoid internal discussions that could look like coordinating stories. Employees who are contacted by agents can decline to talk without a lawyer, and they should never be told to stay silent or to shade the truth.

Company counsel and individual counsel

A company's lawyers represent the company, and individual employees may need their own counsel, especially if their interests could diverge from the company's. In early meetings we look at what the government appears to be focused on, what records exist, which people may be witnesses or subjects, and whether the company is in a position to consider self-reporting. We also look at related exposure, including civil damages claims, foreign competition authorities, and debarment from public contracts. For individuals, the questions include whether to speak with investigators, whether there is a path to cooperation, and how immigration or employment status might be affected.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about criminal antitrust and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.