Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate & Bankruptcy

Cross-Border Insolvency

A supplier in Korea has entered rehabilitation proceedings, a customer in Europe is in administration, or your own company has creditors and assets in more than one country. Which court controls what is rarely obvious.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Cross-Border Insolvency: what usually happens

How US courts deal with a foreign case

Cross-border insolvency in the United States mostly runs through Chapter 15, under which the representative of a foreign insolvency proceeding asks a US bankruptcy court for recognition. Once recognized, the foreign case can reach US assets, stop US litigation, and seek enforcement of foreign orders, subject to protections for US interests. Whether the foreign case is treated as a main proceeding, tied to where the debtor's center of main interests lies, affects which relief follows automatically. A foreign company with property in the United States can also file a full Chapter 11 case here, and some do so to use US restructuring tools.

When the foreign debtor owes you

If a foreign counterparty is in an insolvency proceeding, the first question is whether that case has been or will be recognized here, because recognition can halt your US lawsuit or attachment. Claims may need to be filed in the foreign proceeding under its own rules, deadlines, and language requirements, and missing that process can matter more than anything filed in the United States. Contract terms choosing New York law and New York courts are relevant but do not always prevent a foreign plan from being given effect here. Gather the contracts, invoices, any guarantees or collateral, and notices from the foreign administrator, with translations where needed.

Coordinating across legal systems

Parallel proceedings require coordination between a foreign case, a US case, and sometimes a third forum where assets sit. Courts often communicate under agreed protocols, and outcomes can depend on choices made early, such as where to file first or how assets are held. For Korean companies and their US counterparties, the interaction between Korean rehabilitation proceedings and US recognition comes up regularly. In a first meeting we identify the proceedings that exist or are likely, where the assets and claims sit, and which court's timetable needs attention first.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about cross-border insolvency and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.