Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Economic Interference Litigation

A customer canceled after a competitor got involved, or a former partner is steering clients away, and you suspect it was deliberate. Economic interference litigation tries to answer when that kind of conduct crosses from tough competition into something a court will remedy.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Economic Interference Litigation: what usually happens

Existing contracts versus expected business

Courts treat interference with an existing, enforceable contract differently from interference with business you expected to get. When a binding contract is involved, the focus is usually on whether the outsider knew about it and intentionally caused the other party to breach it. When the relationship had not yet become a contract, or the contract could be ended at will, New York generally requires more than hard competition; courts look for something like wrongful means, such as conduct that is itself unlawful, or actions taken solely to cause harm. That distinction often decides whether a claim survives an early motion. The same conduct may also support claims for breach of a restrictive covenant, misuse of confidential information, or unfair competition.

Evidence that connects conduct to loss

These cases need a clear link between what the defendant did and the business you lost. Contracts, purchase orders, and correspondence showing the relationship existed are a starting point. Messages from customers or partners explaining why they left, and anything showing the defendant's communications with them, are often central. Sales data before and after the interference helps measure the loss. If former employees are involved, review any agreements they signed, but ask before searching their accounts or devices, since how evidence is gathered can create its own legal issues.

Weighing a claim or a defense

In an early review we look at whether the relationship was a binding contract, whether the defendant knew about it, and what the defendant actually did. We also consider whether a quicker remedy, such as a cease-and-desist letter or a request for a court order, fits the situation better than a damages lawsuit. If you are the one accused of interference, we look at whether your conduct was ordinary competition or protected by your own legitimate business interests. Either way, we discuss what a lawsuit would cost, how long it would likely take, and what discovery would expose on both sides.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about economic interference litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.