Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Digital Evidence

Ediscovery Litigation

Most disputes today turn on emails, chat messages, shared drives, and phone data. The rules for how that information is kept, searched, and exchanged create their own stage of the case, with its own risks.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Ediscovery Litigation: what usually happens

Preservation starts before the lawsuit

The duty to preserve relevant information generally begins when litigation is reasonably anticipated, which can be well before a complaint is served. In practice that usually means a written legal hold and suspending automatic deletion for the right accounts, and it can reach work conversations on personal phones or messaging apps. Ephemeral messaging tools draw particular scrutiny. In federal court, the harshest sanctions for lost electronic information generally require a finding that a party intended to deprive the other side of it, while New York state courts apply their own standard, which does not always demand the same showing.

Negotiating scope

Electronic discovery is shaped more by negotiation between the parties than by any single rule. Custodians, date ranges, search terms, data sources, and production formats are typically discussed early, and the federal rules expect discovery to be proportional to the needs of the case. Technology-assisted review, in which software trained by human reviewers ranks documents for relevance, has been accepted by courts and can reduce cost in large matters. Agreements about inadvertently produced privileged material, often entered as a court order, protect against waiver when large volumes move quickly. Disputes the parties cannot resolve go to the judge, who expects to see that they genuinely tried.

Getting the process right early

Ediscovery costs are largely set in the first months of a case. We help clients identify where their data actually lives, issue holds that reach the right people, and choose vendors and review methods proportionate to the matter. When the other side's production looks incomplete, we work through what can be requested and what a court will realistically order. Where a preservation problem has already occurred, the priority is to understand it fully and address it candidly before it surfaces in a deposition. Collection from phones and cloud accounts is often handled by a forensic vendor, so that how the data was gathered can be explained later.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about ediscovery litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.