Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Labor & Employment

Employment Litigation

Employment litigation is usually slower and more document-heavy than either side expects at the start. Decisions made in the opening weeks, about forum, preservation, and insurance, tend to shape the rest.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Employment Litigation: what usually happens

Choosing and confirming the forum

Before anything is filed, the threshold question is where the dispute belongs. An arbitration agreement may require a private forum, and it may also bar bringing the claim on behalf of a group. Some claims must first go to an agency, while others can be filed directly in state or federal court. Wage claims are often brought as class or collective actions, which changes the scale for both sides. Employers should check promptly whether employment practices liability insurance applies, because those policies usually require early notice and can control who defends the case.

Preservation and discovery

Once a dispute is reasonably expected, both sides should stop routine deletion of relevant material. For employers that usually means a written litigation hold covering email, messaging platforms, personnel files, and payroll systems, sent to the people likely to have records. For employees, it means keeping personal messages and devices intact and not cleaning up social media. Discovery then involves exchanging documents, answering written questions, and depositions, which are sworn interviews taken outside court. Electronic records often decide these cases, and gaps in them are themselves examined closely. Personnel files, performance reviews, and pay data for other employees are frequently requested, and protective orders are commonly used to limit how sensitive information is shared.

Where cases tend to resolve

A good share of employment cases resolve through negotiation or mediation, often after key depositions or a ruling on a motion that tests the claims. Others continue to summary judgment, where a court decides whether there is enough evidence for a trial. Settlement terms typically include a release, confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions, and tax treatment of the payment, and New York places limits on confidentiality terms in discrimination settlements. We start by mapping the claims, the forum, the key witnesses and records, and the realistic cost of each path, so that decisions are made with the full picture in view.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about employment litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.