Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Engineering Litigation

A structure cracked, a system failed to perform, or a project ran far over budget, and the design is being blamed. Engineering litigation sorts out whether the problem came from the design, the construction, the materials, or the way the owner used what was built.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Engineering Litigation: what usually happens

Who was responsible for what

Engineering disputes usually involve several parties at once: the owner, the design professionals, the contractor and subcontractors, manufacturers, and their insurers. Engineers are generally judged against a professional standard of care, meaning what a reasonably careful engineer would have done in similar circumstances, rather than a promise of perfect results. Contracts frequently shape the case through scope definitions, limitations of liability, and dispute provisions, and whether a party with no contract with the engineer can bring a claim varies by state and by the type of harm. Equipment failures may also raise separate warranty or product liability claims against manufacturers.

Evidence and time limits

These cases are built on technical records: drawings, specifications, calculations, submittals, inspection reports, change orders, and project correspondence. Physical evidence may need to be preserved before repairs begin, and other parties should usually be given a chance to inspect it, since discarding or altering it can create problems later. Retained technical witnesses typically analyze the cause of the failure and whether the design met the standard of care. Time limits for claims against design professionals can begin running when their work is completed rather than when the problem is discovered, depending on the state and the type of claim, so waiting to see how bad things get can be risky.

Assessing your position

Whether you are an owner, a contractor, or an engineering firm, our first discussion covers the project, the contracts, the failure or dispute, and who has already been notified. For design professionals, prompt notice to the professional liability insurer is often required by the policy. We look at which parties should be brought in, whether early mediation or an agreed site inspection protocol makes sense, and whether contractual notice or claim procedures apply. Bring the contracts, project documents, photographs, and any claim letters or reports already prepared. If repairs are planned, tell us before work starts so that the conditions can be documented first.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about engineering litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.