Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Intentional Tort Claim

Someone struck you, held you somewhere against your will, or deliberately set out to hurt you, and a police report alone has not made you whole.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Intentional Tort Claim: what usually happens

Why intent changes the case

Most injury cases are about carelessness, but an intentional tort claim alleges that the other person meant to do the act that caused the harm. Assault and battery are the familiar examples, though the category is wider. The distinction matters in practical ways. Many liability insurance policies exclude harm caused on purpose, so a person who acted deliberately may have no insurer standing behind them, and collecting a judgment becomes a real question. In New York, several intentional torts also carry a notably shorter filing window than ordinary negligence claims, which surprises people who assume they have plenty of time. Punitive damages are more often in play when conduct was deliberate, though courts award them sparingly.

Records that support the claim

Medical records and photographs taken soon after the incident tend to carry the most weight, so request copies and keep them safe. Note the police report number and the names of the officers involved, and keep any paperwork from a criminal case, because a related prosecution can produce testimony and evidence that later matters in the civil claim. Save messages from the other person, but do not reply to them or reach out, especially if an order of protection is in place. Witness contact details fade quickly, as do security camera recordings, which many businesses overwrite routinely. Before writing out your own account of what happened, talk with your lawyer about how to do it so that it stays protected.

Shaping the claim with you

We start by pinning down the date of the incident, because the filing window may be short and claims involving public employers or agencies can carry an earlier notice requirement. Then we look at who can actually be held responsible: the individual, and sometimes an employer, property owner, or venue whose own failures contributed. Where a criminal case is pending, we discuss timing, since the civil claim and the prosecution move on separate tracks and one can affect the other. We also talk frankly about whether a judgment could be collected. You leave with a clear picture of the options and what each would ask of you.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

04 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about intentional tort claim and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.