Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Internal Investigations Litigation

An internal investigation is opened to find out what happened. Once a lawsuit, a regulator, or a whistleblower enters the picture, the interviews and documents it produced can become the center of a separate fight about what must be handed over.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Internal Investigations Litigation: what usually happens

When the investigation becomes evidence

Investigations into accounting, harassment, bribery, or safety concerns often run alongside litigation or ahead of it. Shareholders may seek the report in a derivative suit, a terminated employee may claim the investigation was a pretext for retaliation, and agencies may ask what the company found. Whether the materials stay protected generally depends on whether lawyers directed the work for the purpose of legal advice, and on what the company later does with the findings. Sharing conclusions with auditors, regulators, or the public can put privilege at risk, and courts do not all draw that line in the same place. Relying on the investigation as a defense can also open it to discovery.

Building a file that holds up

The engagement terms matter from the first day: who retained counsel, on whose behalf, and for what purpose. Interview memoranda prepared by counsel tend to receive more protection than recordings or summaries written by business staff. Employees who are interviewed should be told that the lawyer represents the company rather than them, often called an Upjohn warning, and that the company may choose to share what they say. Litigation holds should go out early and reach messaging apps and personal devices used for work, not only company email. If you are an employee asked to sit for an interview, it is reasonable to ask whether you should have your own counsel.

Choices made at the outset

In an early meeting we map the investigation against every proceeding that is pending or likely, because a choice made for one can affect the others. For a company, that often means deciding how findings will be reported to the board, whether any disclosure to a regulator is planned, and how to keep business advice separate from legal advice in the file. For an individual, it means understanding whether you are a witness or something closer to a subject, and whether your interests and the company's have begun to diverge. These decisions are much easier to control before a subpoena or a motion to compel arrives.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about internal investigations litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.