Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Internet Defamation

Someone posted that you cheated customers, committed a crime, or did something you did not do, and the post now sits near the top of a search for your name. Internet defamation raises the usual questions of truth and harm, plus a few that only exist online.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Internet Defamation: what usually happens

What the claim usually turns on

A defamation claim generally needs a false statement of fact, not just a harsh opinion or a bad review written in exaggerated terms. Courts look at the whole post, its setting, and how a reasonable reader would take it, and a statement framed as opinion can still be actionable if it implies facts that are false. Whether you are a public figure, or the topic is a matter of public concern, can raise the level of fault you have to prove. New York's anti-SLAPP law reaches many online statements about public issues and can expose the person who sued to paying the other side's legal fees if the claim lacks a substantial basis. The filing deadline for defamation is shorter than for most civil claims, so timing deserves early attention.

Capturing the post before it changes

Posts get edited, deleted, and reposted, so preserve what exists now. Save screenshots that show the full post, the account name, the date, the web address, and the replies, and save the page itself where you can. Keep a list of where the statement has been repeated and any messages from people who saw it. Avoid responding publicly or contacting the poster in anger, since replies can become part of the record and can escalate the situation. If the poster is anonymous, a court process may be needed to ask the platform for identifying information, and platforms do not keep that data forever.

Who can be held responsible, and other routes

Federal law generally shields websites and platforms from liability for content their users create, so the claim usually runs against the person who wrote the post rather than the site hosting it. Many platforms do have their own reporting and removal processes, and some false content comes down faster that way than through a lawsuit. A carefully written demand letter is another option in some matters, though it can draw more attention to the post. Our review starts with the exact words, who the speaker likely is, what harm you can show, and whether litigation, a platform request, or a quieter approach fits your goals.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about internet defamation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.