Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Investigations Litigation

A subpoena arrived, an agency asked for documents, or an internal review turned something up, and now there are signs that civil lawsuits may follow.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Investigations Litigation: what usually happens

Where investigations and lawsuits overlap

Investigations litigation covers the stretch where a government inquiry or internal investigation and private lawsuits run side by side. A public disclosure of an investigation often draws shareholder suits, customer claims, or whistleblower actions, and each can seek the same documents the investigators already have. Testimony given in one setting can be used in another. In civil cases, a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment may face an adverse inference, which is not allowed against a criminal defendant, so the decision whether to testify becomes far more complicated when a civil case is also running. Courts sometimes pause civil discovery while a criminal matter is pending, but that is discretionary.

Protecting privilege and records

Once an investigation or a lawsuit is reasonably anticipated, ordinary document deletion should stop, and a written hold notice usually goes to the people and systems involved. How an internal review is set up matters: work directed by counsel for the purpose of legal advice has a better chance of staying privileged than a business review that a lawyer later joins. Handing privileged material to a government agency can waive protection against private litigants in many courts, so the decision to share an internal report needs careful thought. Keep a log of what has been produced, to whom, and under what terms. Employees should understand that the company's counsel does not represent them individually.

Coordinating both tracks from the start

We map every proceeding, actual and likely, and the deadlines each carries. The goal is consistency: statements to regulators, filings in court, public disclosures, and testimony should not contradict one another. We look at insurance, since directors and officers policies may respond to investigations and related suits, depending on how the policy defines a claim, and their notice requirements are easy to miss. Where individual employees or executives need their own counsel, we raise it early. The first meeting should produce a sequence for the coming weeks rather than a stack of separate emergencies.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about investigations litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.