Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

IP Due Diligence

A buyer assumes the target owns its software, its brand, and its data. IP due diligence is how that assumption gets tested before the price reflects it.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

IP Due Diligence: what usually happens

Who actually owns it

The most common problem found in IP due diligence is a gap in ownership. Founders may have written the first code before the company existed, contractors may have built key features without signing an assignment, and employees may have worked under agreements that never transferred their inventions. In the United States, copyrightable work by an outside contractor is usually owned by the contractor unless there is a written assignment, because the categories of work made for hire are narrow. Registrations can also be in the wrong name, lapsed, or still pending. Many gaps can be fixed before closing, but only if they are found early enough to obtain signatures from the people involved.

Licenses, open source, and data

Inbound licenses for software and content may prohibit assignment or terminate on a change of control, which matters especially in an asset sale. Outbound licenses can grant customers or partners rights that limit what the buyer can do with the technology. Open-source components are nearly universal, and most raise no issue, but some licenses impose obligations on how combined code is distributed, so a scan of the codebase and a review of how the product is delivered are standard steps. Where the business depends on data, diligence also covers where the data came from, what permissions allow its use, and whether privacy commitments restrict transfer to a new owner. Trade secret protection depends on reasonable confidentiality practices, so diligence asks what those practices actually were.

Turning findings into the deal

Findings feed into the purchase agreement as specific representations, closing conditions requiring missing assignments, special indemnities, or price adjustments. Pending or threatened infringement claims, demand letters, and disputes with former founders or contractors deserve particular attention, because they often reveal ownership problems as well. For sellers, a pre-sale review of assignments, registrations, and open-source use can prevent late surprises that slow the deal. We begin with the IP schedule the seller provides, the employment and contractor agreements, and a description of how the core product was built.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about IP due diligence and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.