Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

IPO Defense

The shares fell after the offering, and now a complaint says the prospectus left out something investors should have known. IPO defense covers the company, its directors and officers, and the underwriters, and each of them stands in a different position.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

IPO Defense: what usually happens

How offering claims are framed

Claims over a registration statement under the federal Securities Act do not require proof that anyone intended to mislead, which makes them different from the fraud claims seen in many other stock cases. The issuer has very limited defenses once a material misstatement or omission is shown, while directors, underwriters, and certain others can defend by showing they investigated reasonably. Defendants can also argue that the drop was caused by something other than the alleged misstatement, which can reduce or eliminate damages. These claims can be filed in state court, although many companies now have charter provisions directing them to federal court. Parallel suits, sometimes in more than one court, are common, and coordinating them is part of the early work.

The diligence record matters most

Preserve the full drafting history of the registration statement, including comment letters from the SEC and the responses. Due diligence materials, management presentations, and the underwriters' diligence files are often at the center of the defense. Board minutes and committee materials show what directors were told and what they asked. Auditor comfort letters and accountant workpapers may be relevant if financial statements are questioned. A litigation hold should go out promptly, covering personal devices and messaging apps that executives used for business, because gaps in records tend to become an issue of their own.

Early strategy decisions

One of the first questions is how indemnification and insurance will work, since the underwriting agreement usually allocates some liability and D&O policies often contain offering-specific provisions. Separate counsel may be needed for individual defendants or underwriters whose interests could diverge from the company's. We look at the forum, whether a motion to dismiss is realistic based on the disclosures and the risk factors, and how the case affects ongoing SEC reporting. Communications with investors and employees should be coordinated with counsel once a claim is filed. If you are still preparing for an offering, the same issues argue for a careful disclosure process now.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about IPO defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.