Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Labor & Employment

Labor Litigation

A union has filed unfair labor practice charges, a grievance is headed to arbitration, or workers have sued over pay. Labor litigation covers several different forums, and the first task is knowing which one the dispute belongs in.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Labor Litigation: what usually happens

Labor law and employment law are separate tracks

In the narrower sense, labor law means the rules for unions, organizing, and collective bargaining, which for most private employers fall under the National Labor Relations Act and the National Labor Relations Board. Unfair labor practice charges go to the Board rather than to court, and many disputes under a union contract go to grievance arbitration. Employment litigation, by contrast, covers individual and group claims about discrimination, wages, leave, and termination, usually in court or before agencies. Public employees in New York are covered by the state's Taylor Law rather than the federal labor board, with disputes going to the Public Employment Relations Board or, for many city workers, New York City's own labor agency. Some cases blend the two, which raises questions about which forum takes priority.

Preemption and the union contract

When a claim depends on interpreting a collective bargaining agreement, federal labor law can push it out of state court and into the contract's grievance process or federal court. Claims based on independent rights, such as many discrimination and wage protections, can often proceed on their own, though the line is frequently litigated. A union contract may also require arbitration of statutory claims, and courts generally look for clear language before holding employees to that. Getting this sorting right early avoids spending months in the wrong forum.

What goes into a first assessment

We review the collective bargaining agreement if there is one, any charge or complaint filed, and the communications between management, workers, and the union. We look at deadlines, which can be short for unfair labor practice charges and grievances, and at whether related cases are already pending. Where a matter involves both a union contract and statutory claims, we look at whether one proceeding should wait for the other. For employers, we consider how statements to employees during a dispute could themselves become the basis of a charge. For workers, we consider whether the union, the agency, or a court is the right place to raise the issue.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about labor litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.