Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Legal Due Diligence

A buyer, investor, or lender is about to rely on what a company says about itself. Legal due diligence is the work of checking those statements against the documents before money changes hands.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Legal Due Diligence: what usually happens

What gets reviewed

Legal due diligence usually covers the company's formation and ownership records, its material contracts, pending and threatened litigation, intellectual property, employment practices, real estate, permits, and regulatory compliance. The aim is not to read every document but to find what affects value or creates risk: a key customer contract that ends on a change of control, a trademark the business depends on but does not own, or workers treated as contractors whose status is questionable. The scope should match the deal, since a minority investment, a full acquisition, and a loan call for different depth. Financial and tax diligence usually run alongside and are handled by accountants.

For the company being reviewed

Sellers and companies raising money benefit from preparing before a data room opens. Gather signed versions of key contracts with all amendments, the stock ledger or membership records, board and owner consents, IP assignments, and licenses. Gaps found by the company itself can be fixed or disclosed on its own terms; gaps found by the other side tend to become price reductions or special indemnities. Be careful about uploading privileged communications or sensitive personal data, since sharing them can waive protections or create privacy issues. Assign one person inside the company to coordinate responses, so that questions from the other side's team are answered consistently.

Turning findings into protection

Diligence findings matter only if they change the deal. We report issues by significance rather than in a document-by-document summary, and we translate each one into a response: a closing condition, a specific representation, an indemnity, a price adjustment, or a decision to walk away. We also flag issues that need attention after closing, such as consents to collect or filings to update. At the start we agree on scope, materiality thresholds, and timing, so that the review supports your decision without turning into an open-ended project. Findings that are minor in isolation can still matter when several of them point to the same weakness.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about legal due diligence and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.