Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Merger Control

A New York company is buying a business with subsidiaries in Europe and Asia, or a Korean company is acquiring a U.S. target. Before signing, someone has to map which competition authorities expect a filing and which of them can hold up the closing.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Merger Control: what usually happens

Mapping where filings are required

Dozens of countries have merger control regimes, and many use thresholds based on the parties' sales or assets within that country, so a deal between two foreign companies can still require a local filing. The United States, the European Union, China, Korea, and many others run mandatory regimes, while the United Kingdom's system is voluntary but lets its authority investigate deals that were never notified. Thresholds and filing triggers differ widely, and some count the sales or assets of the whole corporate group rather than only the target. Mapping requires reliable revenue data broken down by country, which should be gathered early because it often takes longer than expected.

Suspensory reviews and timing

In most mandatory regimes, the deal cannot close until clearance is obtained or a waiting period expires, and closing early can bring penalties. Review periods differ, and the longest or most complex review usually sets the timeline for the whole transaction. Some authorities have formal pre-notification phases that add time before the official clock starts. Remedies negotiated in one jurisdiction may need to be coordinated with others to avoid inconsistent requirements. Separate foreign investment screening regimes, such as CFIUS in the United States, may also apply and follow their own timelines.

Planning the filings

Merger control planning starts with a list of jurisdictions where filings are likely required, an estimate of timing for each, and an early view of which could raise substantive concerns. We coordinate with local counsel abroad and align the submissions so that descriptions of the markets and the deal stay consistent across authorities. The purchase agreement should reflect this plan, including the outside date and the conditions tied to required approvals. For Korean and other foreign buyers of U.S. businesses, the home-country filing and the U.S. review often have to be sequenced together. Bring the deal structure, revenue and asset data by country for both parties, and an outline of where the businesses overlap.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about merger control and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.