Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Digital Evidence

Motion for Discovery Sanctions

The other side keeps missing deadlines to produce documents, or you have just been served with a motion accusing you of withholding or losing evidence. Either way, a motion for discovery sanctions can change the shape of a case.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Motion for Discovery Sanctions: what usually happens

When a sanctions motion is on the table

Courts expect the parties to handle most discovery disagreements themselves, and court rules generally require a good-faith attempt to resolve the dispute, sometimes followed by a conference with the court, before a discovery motion is filed. A motion for discovery sanctions usually follows something more serious than ordinary delay, such as ignoring an order compelling production or losing evidence after a duty to preserve it arose. Remedies range from an order to pay the other side's costs, through instructions that let a jury assume missing evidence was unfavorable, up to striking claims or defenses in the most serious cases. Judges have broad discretion and tend to match the response to the conduct and the harm it caused.

Lost electronic information

Disputes over emails, chat messages, and other electronic data now make up a large share of sanctions practice. In federal court, the harshest measures for lost electronic information generally require a finding that a party acted with intent to deprive the other side of it, while lesser measures can address prejudice. New York state courts apply their own standards, which differ in some respects. In both settings, the timing of the litigation hold, the systems it reached, and whether auto-delete settings were turned off are usually central questions. Records showing what preservation steps were taken, and when, are often the strongest response to an accusation.

Bringing or answering the motion

If you are considering such a motion, we look at whether the conduct is clearly documented, whether the required meet-and-confer steps were taken, and whether a narrower request such as a motion to compel would serve you better. If you are on the receiving end, we look at what actually happened, often with help from your IT staff or a forensic vendor, and whether the gap can be filled from other sources. Correcting a problem promptly and candidly tends to matter to judges. We also consider how the dispute affects the court's view of the case as a whole, since sanctions fights can overshadow the merits.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

04 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about motion for discovery sanctions and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.