Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Outsourcing Litigation

The provider missed service levels for months, the migration stalled, or the customer stopped paying invoices it disputes. Outsourcing litigation tends to be shaped as much by the exit and transition as by the breach itself.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Outsourcing Litigation: what usually happens

Common fault lines

Outsourcing agreements usually combine a master services agreement with statements of work and service level schedules. Disputes often concern whether service levels were missed, whether service credits are the exclusive remedy, and whether failures rise to a material breach that permits termination. Limitation-of-liability clauses and exclusions for consequential damages frequently decide how much can be recovered, and the line between direct and consequential loss is often contested. Data security incidents, disputed scope, and pricing changes generate further claims. Many agreements require governance meetings and escalation before either side may sue or arbitrate. Regulated customers, such as banks and health care organizations, may have compliance obligations that follow the outsourced function, which can turn a performance failure into a regulatory problem.

Records that tell the story

Gather the master agreement, statements of work, change requests, and service level reports, along with governance minutes and escalation correspondence. Invoices and payment records show the financial history, and project plans show what was promised and when. Preserve access to systems and data, and confirm who controls backups, credentials, and documentation. If termination is being considered, review the termination assistance provisions to make sure operations can continue during any transition, since withholding cooperation can itself become a claim.

Choosing the path

We begin by reviewing the dispute resolution and termination clauses, because a misstep can expose a party to a counterclaim for wrongful termination. We assess whether a negotiated exit or a restructured agreement makes more sense than a contested proceeding, especially when the customer still depends on the provider's services. If the relationship will end, we plan the transition to protect operations and data. If outsourcing litigation proceeds, we evaluate which claims and damages survive the contractual limits and how the evidence of performance will be presented. Where the provider holds the customer's data, we address its return early, because leverage over data can complicate any negotiation.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about outsourcing litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.