Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit

You own shares and believe the directors or officers have harmed the company, through self-dealing, waste, or ignoring obvious problems. The harm falls on the company first, and a shareholder derivative lawsuit is the tool designed for that situation.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit: what usually happens

Whose claim it really is

In a derivative case, the shareholder sues on behalf of the corporation, and any recovery generally goes to the company rather than to the shareholder who brought the case. That is different from a direct claim, where a shareholder sues over harm to his or her own rights, such as being denied a vote or being treated differently from other holders. Telling the two apart is not always easy, and courts look closely at whose injury is being claimed. Because the claim belongs to the company, the board normally controls whether to pursue it. A shareholder can only step in under conditions set by state law, usually the law of the state where the company was incorporated.

What usually has to happen first

In New York and Delaware, a shareholder generally must either ask the board to take action before suing or explain in detail why asking would be pointless, for example because a majority of the board is personally involved. Courts take this step seriously, and complaints that skip it or address it in general terms are often dismissed. Shareholders are usually required to have owned their shares when the wrong occurred and to keep holding them while the case continues. Before filing, many shareholders use their right to inspect corporate books and records to gather facts. Keep your brokerage statements and records of when you acquired the shares, and save the public filings or communications that first raised your concern.

Questions for an initial meeting

We look at whether the claim belongs to the company or to you directly, which state's law governs, and whether a demand on the board or a records inspection makes sense as a first step. We discuss the practical side as well: these cases take time, any recovery goes to the company, and settlements often include governance changes rather than large payments. In many states, including New York, a derivative settlement needs court approval. If you are a shareholder in a closely held company, a direct claim or a dissolution or buyout proceeding may fit your situation better, and we compare those paths with you.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

04 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about shareholder derivative lawsuit and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.