Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Technology Defense

A major customer says the platform you delivered never worked, a privacy class action names your app, or a rival company says the engineers you hired brought its secrets with them.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Technology Defense: what usually happens

The claims technology companies face

Technology defense is less about one kind of lawsuit than about the recurring disputes that follow growing tech businesses. Customers bring contract claims when an implementation fails or service levels are missed, and the outcome often depends on how the agreement allocated risk through warranties, limits on liability, and acceptance terms. Consumer and privacy claims arrive as class actions over data collection, tracking technologies, biometrics, or automatic renewals, under laws that vary sharply from state to state. Hiring from a competitor can lead to trade secret and contract claims against both the new employees and the company that hired them.

Preparing before a dispute peaks

When a claim is threatened, put a legal hold in place covering product logs, customer communications, data maps, and the relevant code. For a customer dispute, gather the contract, statements of work, change orders, support tickets, and acceptance records, since the paper trail often tells a different story than the complaint. For privacy claims, identify what the product actually collects and shares, how the privacy policy described it, and which third-party tools are embedded in the product. When new hires come from a competitor, document that they were told not to bring a prior employer's materials, and if a claim arrives, have their devices examined through counsel rather than informally.

Choices in the first weeks

Contracts and terms of service come first in our review, because arbitration clauses, class action waivers, forum selection, and liability caps often frame the defense before any facts are argued. Some claims respond well to an early motion; others are better resolved through negotiation or a business accommodation. Regulators sometimes take an interest in the same conduct, so public statements and product changes should be coordinated. We also check insurance, including technology errors and omissions and cyber policies. You should leave with a defense plan that fits the company's commercial priorities.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about technology defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.