Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Legal Intellectual

Tired of unprofessional or promotional legal answers?
Daeryun specialist lawyers will answer your questions.

Q

Even after receiving a notice of appropriateness for a business plan under the Wastes Control Act, is a disposition of non-permission possible?

Legal IntellectualViews3,888

In order to run a waste disposal business, I submitted a business plan and received a notice of 'appropriateness' from the city hall. Accordingly, I spent hundreds of millions of won installing odor-prevention facilities, equipped all the facilities and equipment in accordance with the relevant statutes, and then applied for permission. However, during the permission review, residents opposed the installation of the waste disposal facility, and the administrative agency ultimately issued a disposition of non-permission on the ground of the results of a public hearing. Having already invested considerable cost and time in reliance on the notice of appropriateness, I would like to know whether such a disposition truly conforms to the Wastes Control Act, and whether I can seek its revocation through administrative litigation.

Wastes Control Act

A

Answer to Related Inquiry

Hello. This is a corporate attorney at Daeryun Law LLC.

The matter you describe is a typical case for administrative litigation, in which the lawfulness of a disposition of non-permission after a notice of appropriateness for a business plan under the Wastes Control Act is at issue.

First, under Article 25 of the Wastes Control Act, a business operator who intends to run a waste disposal business must submit a business plan and undergo the administrative agency's review of its appropriateness, and where a notice of appropriateness has been received, if the operator applies for permission after equipping the facilities, equipment, and technical personnel in accordance with that business plan, the administrative agency must, as a rule, grant the permission.

In other words, a notice of appropriateness for a business plan constitutes an official judgment by the administrative agency on which the operator can rely at the subsequent permission stage.

Where an operator has invested considerable cost in reliance on this and has met all the requirements, the administrative agency must, absent special circumstances, respect it, and if it does not, a violation of the principle of protection of trust may be at issue.

As in the matter you ask about, where a disposition of non-permission is issued after a notice of appropriateness solely on the ground of residents' opposition or the results of a public hearing, shifting that disadvantage onto an operator who has already met the statutory requirements is highly likely to run counter to the purpose of the Wastes Control Act and to principles of administrative law.

In particular, where there is no material change in the content of the business plan itself after the notice of appropriateness, there is no violation of other statutes such as the Wastes Control Act, the Clean Air Conservation Act, or water-quality-related statutes, and the requirements for facilities, equipment, and technical capacity are all met, there is a high likelihood that the administrative agency's refusal of permission on the ground of discretion will be judged unlawful.

In such a case, you can contest the unlawfulness of the disposition through an administrative appeal or administrative litigation seeking revocation of the disposition of non-permission of the waste disposal business, and in practice there are not a few cases in which a disposition of non-permission after a notice of appropriateness is revoked on the ground that it violated the principle of protection of trust.

Because a licensing dispute related to the Wastes Control Act requires a comprehensive review of the course from the business-plan stage to the permission stage, the circumstances of the administrative agency's judgment, and the scope of the trust interest invested by the operator, it is very important to establish a response strategy with the help of an attorney with abundant experience in administrative litigation from the outset.

As in the present situation, if enormous harm is arising from the disposition of non-permission, it is advisable to accurately analyze the unlawfulness of the disposition and then promptly prepare administrative litigation.

Because the direction of the response may differ depending on the more specific facts, we recommend that you obtain a detailed review through a prompt legal consultation.

Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 240
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

General Corporate Matters Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk