Incheon Divorce Attorney | Incheon Divorce Attorney Who Succeeded in Defending Against a Division of Marital Property Lawsuit

The Incheon divorce attorney’s client expressed a sense of injustice at this claim.

This was because, when the petitioner and the client divorced by agreement, they had agreed that the client would not claim child support from the petitioner and that the petitioner would waive any claim for division of marital property against the client.

The Incheon divorce attorney’s client married the petitioner and became a lawful married couple, and children were born, forming a family of four.

A few years later, however, the client heard from an acquaintance of the petitioner that the petitioner had long been maintaining an inappropriate relationship and engaging in adulterous conduct with an employee of the cafe in the petitioner’s company building.

To confirm this, the client examined the petitioner’s mobile phone, and the petitioner had been carrying on an adulterous relationship with the cafe employee for several years.

The client then learned that, in addition to the cafe employee, the petitioner had also engaged in adulterous conduct by having sexual relations with a member of a hobby club.

Throughout the marriage, the petitioner had deceived the Incheon divorce attorney’s client and continued adulterous conduct with two men.

Upon learning of these facts, the client could not maintain the marriage with the petitioner, and, with the marriage thus brought to a breakdown, the client applied for a divorce by agreement with the petitioner, and the divorce was established.

One month after the petitioner’s adulterous conduct came to light, the client applied for a divorce by agreement. The Incheon divorce attorney’s client then filed a damages lawsuit against the cafe employee and the hobby club member for payment of consolation money in order to hold them responsible for the breakdown of the marriage caused by the adulterous conduct.

After the application for divorce by agreement, however, the petitioner suddenly disappeared, and a few months later placed a provisional attachment on real estate held in the client’s name and then filed a divorce lawsuit.

The petitioner, who had disappeared and returned, told the client that she had filed a divorce lawsuit because she had to receive property, and the client was stunned by such a statement from the petitioner.

The Incheon divorce attorney’s client told the petitioner that, if the divorce lawsuit proceeded in this way, the children could be hurt, and that the client would have no choice but to properly recover consolation money and child support from the petitioner in the divorce lawsuit, and the client asked the petitioner to reconsider the divorce lawsuit.

The petitioner then came to think that proceeding with the divorce lawsuit would bring her no benefit, and the parties mutually agreed that the petitioner would withdraw the divorce lawsuit she had filed, conclude the divorce through the divorce by agreement procedure as it stood, and waive division of marital property against the client, while the client, in turn, would not claim child support from the petitioner.

Thus, the petitioner and the client designated the client as the holder of parental authority and the custodian of the children and, as agreed, the Incheon divorce attorney’s client did not receive child support from the petitioner and the petitioner did not claim division of marital property in the future, completing the divorce by agreement and obtaining the divorce, so, because the petitioner waived the claim for division of marital property against the client, the petitioner’s claim in this case has no merit.