Damages Attorney Defense Case | Plaintiff's Claim Dismissed with the Assistance of a Damages Attorney, Prevailing in a Damages Lawsuit

The damages attorney conducted a legal consultation in order to grasp the client's case accurately.

The client had successfully carried out a large-scale gas pipeline construction project.

However, the project's client had filed a damages lawsuit against him on the ground that the gas pipeline construction had not been properly performed.

Because the project's client demanded additional damages while not even having paid the construction payment, he determined that he needed professional legal assistance to defend against this unreasonable assertion.

Accordingly, in order to clear himself of this injustice, he resolved to mount a legal response through the assistance of an attorney with rich experience in damages litigation, and he visited Daeryun.

■ Civil Act

Article 750 (Contents of Tort)
Any person who causes loss to or inflicts injuries on another person by an unlawful act, whether intentional or negligent, shall be liable to make compensation for the loss arising therefrom.

■ Civil Procedure Act

Article 202-2 (Calculation of the Amount of Damages)
Where it is recognized that loss has occurred but it is very difficult by the nature of the matter to prove the specific amount of the loss, the court may determine, as the amount of damages, an amount recognized as reasonable in light of all circumstances established by the overall purport of the pleadings and the results of the examination of evidence.

The damages attorney actively argued in court that, among the damages claimed by the project's client, the assertion regarding the cost of installing meters was unreasonable.

He proved that, with digital meters already installed, additional remote meters were unnecessary, and on that basis he emphasized that the project's client's claim for damages was unreasonable.

Thanks to such pleadings by the Daeryun damages attorney, the court rendered a judgment that the project's client's assertion was without merit.

The damages attorney refuted the project's client's assertion of non-performance of the construction work through thorough investigation.

The damages attorney submitted as evidence the construction site records, the pipeline installation confirmation, and photographs of the completed work, thereby establishing that the client had faithfully performed the construction contract.

In particular, he emphasized that, following the installation of the gas pipeline, even the digital meters had been properly installed, thereby making clear that the project's client's assertion of damages was false.

Based on the damages attorney's arguments, the court recognized that the client's construction work had been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract.

The damages attorney's assistance enabled the client to have the plaintiff's claim dismissed and to prevail in the unjustly filed damages lawsuit.

The court recognized that the client's construction work had been carried out properly in accordance with the contract.

It also determined that the damages claim of the project's client who had filed the lawsuit was a groundless assertion, and all claims for additional costs were dismissed as well.

With the assistance of the damages attorney, the client recovered the unpaid construction payment and prevailed in the claim for a substantial amount of damages.

If you are someone who has been sued in a damages lawsuit as in the situation above, 🔗please visit Daeryun Law Firm for a consultation.