Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Deals & Cases

Violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act

[Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Litigation Case] As a Result of Assistance in a Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case, a Suspended Sentence Was Imposed

As a result of Daeryun's assistance for a client who came in needing to defend a Punishment of Tax Evaders Act case, the client was able to receive a suspended sentence.

CONTENTS
  • 1. How the Client Came to Defend a Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case
    • - The Circumstances of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case
    • - Laws Related to the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case
  • 2. Daeryun's Assistance in Defending the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case
    • - Arguing in the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case That the Client Did Not Lead the Offense
    • - Arguing That the Client Had No Criminal History Apart From the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case
    • - Arguing That the Client Was Bitterly Remorseful for the Violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act
  • 3. As a Result of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case, a Suspended Sentence Was Imposed
    • - The Result of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case: a Suspended Sentence

1. How the Client Came to Defend a Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case

The client, who needed to defend a Punishment of Tax Evaders Act case, came to an attorney with relevant experience at Daeryun to obtain assistance.

The Circumstances of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case

The client who came to defend a Punishment of Tax Evaders Act case was the head of a small or medium-sized enterprise.

Although the client had not supplied any services, he issued and received false tax invoices as if the supply had taken place.

He repeated this wrongful conduct several times, issuing false tax invoices amounting to several billion won.

The client therefore came to an attorney with relevant experience at Daeryun to obtain assistance in defending the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act case.

Laws Related to the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case

■ Laws Related to the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case

▶ Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Article 10 (Violation of the Obligation to Issue Tax Invoices, etc.)

(1) A person who commits any of the following acts shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than one year, or a fine not exceeding twice the amount calculated by applying the value-added tax rate to the supply value..

1. The act of a person required to issue a tax invoice under the Value-Added Tax Act failing to issue the tax invoice or issuing it with false entries

2. The act of a person required to issue an invoice under the Income Tax Act or the Corporate Tax Act failing to issue the invoice or issuing it with false entries

3. The act of a person required to submit a sum table of tax invoices by customer under the Value-Added Tax Act submitting the sum table of tax invoices by customer with false entries

4. The act of a person required to submit a sum table of invoices by customer under the Income Tax Act or the Corporate Tax Act submitting the sum table of invoices by customer with false entries

(2) A person who commits any of the following acts shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than one year, or a fine not exceeding twice the amount calculated by applying the value-added tax rate to the supply value.

1. The act of a person required to receive a tax invoice under the Value-Added Tax Act, in collusion, failing to receive the tax invoice or receiving a tax invoice with false entries

2. The act of a person required to receive an invoice under the Income Tax Act or the Corporate Tax Act, in collusion, failing to receive the invoice or receiving an invoice with false entries

3. The act of a person required to submit a sum table of tax invoices by supplier under the Value-Added Tax Act, in collusion, submitting the sum table of tax invoices by supplier with false entries

4. The act of a person required to submit a sum table of invoices by supplier under the Income Tax Act or the Corporate Tax Act, in collusion, submitting the sum table of invoices by supplier with false entries

(3) A person who, without supplying or being supplied with goods or services, commits any of the following acts shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than three years, or a fine not exceeding three times the amount calculated by applying the value-added tax rate to the supply value.

1. The act of issuing or receiving a tax invoice under the Value-Added Tax Act

2. The act of issuing or receiving an invoice under the Income Tax Act and the Corporate Tax Act

3. The act of submitting a sum table of tax invoices by customer or supplier under the Value-Added Tax Act with false entries

4. The act of submitting a sum table of invoices by customer or supplier under the Income Tax Act and the Corporate Tax Act with false entries

(4) A person who arranges or brokers an act under paragraph (3) shall also be punished by the same penalty as in paragraph (3). In this case, where a tax accountant, certified public accountant, or attorney representing tax affairs arranges or brokers an act under paragraph (3), the applicable penalty shall be increased by one half, notwithstanding Article 22 (2) of the Certified Tax Accountant Act.

(5) A person who commits the offense under paragraph (3) may be punished by both imprisonment and a fine concurrently, depending on the circumstances (情狀).

2. Daeryun's Assistance in Defending the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case

To defend the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act case, Daeryun assisted with the overall procedure of the case through close consultation with the client.

Arguing in the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case That the Client Did Not Lead the Offense

To defend the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act case, Daeryun's attorney with relevant experience argued that the client had not led the offense.

The client had worked in public service for a long period, and it was his first time running a company after entering the private sector.

Taking advantage of this, an acquaintance who ran a business of the same kind lured him in, and he committed the unlawful act without realizing it.

Daeryun's attorney with relevant experience submitted materials proving the above argument and assisted in defending the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act case.

Arguing That the Client Had No Criminal History Apart From the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case

To defend the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act case, Daeryun's attorney with relevant experience argued that the client had no criminal history at all apart from this case.

The attorney emphasized that the client had not been involved in any offense of the same kind, nor in any offense of a different kind.

It was also demonstrated that the client had set a good example and conducted himself diligently throughout his long career in public service.

Daeryun's attorney with relevant experience emphasized that the client was an ordinary citizen who had lived diligently as a sound member of society.

Arguing That the Client Was Bitterly Remorseful for the Violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act

The client, who had violated the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, argued that he was bitterly remorseful and deeply regretful of his unlawful conduct.

The client was living a life of effort, working part-time and as a day laborer and faithfully making his repayment payments.

Daeryun's attorney with relevant experience emphasized that the client had actively cooperated with the investigation and had resolved never to commit an unlawful act again.

3. As a Result of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case, a Suspended Sentence Was Imposed

As a result of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act case, the client received a suspended sentence with the assistance of Daeryun's attorney with relevant experience.

The Result of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act Case: a Suspended Sentence

The client who came to Daeryun for a violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act needed assistance in defending the case.

Daeryun's attorney with relevant experience assisted with the overall procedure in order to defend the case.

As a result, the court accepted the arguments of Daeryun's attorney with relevant experience and imposed a suspended sentence.

If you are struggling in a situation similar to that of the client above, you may come to Daeryun Law Firm at any time.

[조세범처벌법 소송사례] 조세범처벌법 소송 조력 결과, 집행유예 선고

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Related Information
Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 260
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk