Ulsan Attorney Recommendation Case | An Ulsan Attorney Concluded a Client's Indecent Act by Compulsion Charge with a No-Prosecution Decision

We examined in detail the account of the client who received a referral to a Ulsan attorney.

The client, who resides in Ulsan, went on his first blind date in his life.

The atmosphere was very good, to the extent that the gathering continued through a second and even a third round of drinks.

The client and the victim moved to the client's home and had more drinks there.

The client, who had no experience with the opposite sex, believed that the victim, by coming to his home, had given implicit sexual consent, and he requested sexual intercourse.

Although the victim refused, saying no, the client thought she was being coy and continued his conduct.

However, when the victim firmly refused and pushed him away, he then stopped his conduct and realized that he had committed indecent act by compulsion.

The client apologized immediately, but the victim did not accept the apology and reported the client on charges of 🔗indecent act by compulsion .

Sexual molestation refers to any act of making physical contact with another person without consent and thereby arousing a sense of sexual humiliation.

An indecent act by compulsion, then, is an offense that applies where a person commits an indecent act against another by means of assault or intimidation.

In the case of an indecent act by compulsion, a person may, under the Criminal Act, be subject to imprisonment with labor for not more than ten years or to a fine not exceeding 15 million won.

The client, who came to our Ulsan office, conveyed a sincere apology to the victim and offered a settlement payment.

The victim accepted the client's apology and prepared a settlement agreement.

The Daeryun Ulsan attorney argued that the client had offered a deep apology and had reached a settlement with the victim, and requested leniency.

For the client who came to our Ulsan office, Daeryun emphasized that there was no risk of reoffending.

The client lost both parents at an early age and, since high school, has lived like family with the owner of the restaurant where the client worked part-time.

The client holds deep gratitude toward the restaurant owner and the owner's spouse, who took the client in as their own child, and has lived diligently as a member of society in order to be a child of whom they could be proud.

In addition, despite limited financial means, the client was a young person who lived altruistically and exemplarily, regularly donating to an orphanage.

The client was deeply ashamed and promised the restaurant owner and the owner's spouse never to commit such an act again.

In response, the owner and the owner's spouse also pleaded for leniency, stating that they would provide support so that such an incident would never recur.

The Daeryun Ulsan attorney submitted a petition and argued that, because the client was deeply remorseful, there was no risk of reoffending.