CONTENTS
- 1. The Client's Situation

- - How the Client Came to the Mokpo Damages Attorney
- 2. The Statutes Relevant to the Case, as Explained by the Mokpo Damages Attorney

- 3. The Assistance Provided by the Mokpo Damages Attorney

- - The Mokpo Damages Attorney's Argument (1): No Ability or Intention to Repay
- - The Mokpo Damages Attorney's Argument (2): No Compensation for the Loss Was Made
- 4. The Court's Decision on the Mokpo Damages Attorney's Argument

- - If You Need the Help of a Mokpo Damages Attorney
1. The Client's Situation

The client sought to succeed in a claim for damages with the assistance of an attorney experienced in a wide range of civil cases.
How the Client Came to the Mokpo Damages Attorney
The circumstances of the client for help are as follows.
The client first came to know the defendant through a factory-related contract.
One day, the defendant proposed to the client that, if the client lent money, the defendant would pay monthly interest of 400,000 won and would help ensure that a factory could be properly built on the purchased land.
In addition, the defendant promised to arrange a loan for the client and to repay the borrowed money once the factory was fully constructed.
However, even after the factory was built, the defendant was not repaying the borrowed money at all.
In fact, from the time the defendant borrowed the money from the client, the defendant had no intention or ability whatsoever to repay it.
The defendant deceived the client and obtained approximately 40 million won, causing substantial loss to the client.
Having fallen into financial difficulty due to the betrayal of the trusted defendant, the client came to a Mokpo damages attorney seeking to succeed in a claim for damages through a 🔗damages action.
2. The Statutes Relevant to the Case, as Explained by the Mokpo Damages Attorney
A loan for consumption is a contract in which one person lends money or another item to another person, and the borrower promises to return the same kind and quantity of the item at a later time.
If the debtor does not repay as promised, the creditor may demand compensation for the loss thereby incurred.
In other words, if borrowed money is not repaid on time, the lender may demand compensation for the loss.
(1) Damages for non-performance of an obligation are limited to ordinary damages.
(2) The debtor is liable for damages arising from special circumstances only where the debtor knew or could have known of such circumstances.
However, where performance has become impossible without the debtor's intent or negligence, a lawsuit may not be filed.
3. The Assistance Provided by the Mokpo Damages Attorney
The Mokpo damages attorney formed a task force of three to twenty members, including a civil attorney, and analyzed the client's case in depth.
Drawing on extensive practical experience, the attorney established a systematic strategy and made the following arguments.
The Mokpo Damages Attorney's Argument (1): No Ability or Intention to Repay
At the time the defendant borrowed the money from the client, the defendant had no position or ability to assist with the construction of the client's factory or with obtaining a loan.
The defendant intended to use the money borrowed from the client for living expenses and stock investments, and, having no source of income, had no intention or ability whatsoever to repay the borrowed money.
The attorney emphasized that, because the defendant had deceived the client and obtained the money, the defendant had an obligation to pay damages to the client.
The Mokpo Damages Attorney's Argument (2): No Compensation for the Loss Was Made
Apart from the 600,000 won paid as interest and the approximately 5 million won paid belatedly after indictment, no compensation whatsoever had been made for the loss caused by the fraud amount.
During the investigation, the defendant never once apologized to the client and merely requested a settlement, making no effort at all to compensate for the loss.
The attorney therefore emphasized that the defendant should pay damages to the client.
4. The Court's Decision on the Mokpo Damages Attorney's Argument
The court, accepting the Mokpo damages attorney's argument, ruled ‘The defendant shall pay the plaintiff approximately 36 million won.’
By proceeding with the case together with the Mokpo damages attorney, the client was able to succeed in having the full amount of the damages claim granted.
If You Need the Help of a Mokpo Damages Attorney
Because the outcome of a civil case depends on whether causation can be proven, obtaining the assistance of an attorney can be advantageous.
The civil and damages attorneys at Daeryun Law Firm closely examine the facts of a case and provide comprehensive legal services for litigation.
In addition, a task force of three to twenty members, including civil attorneys, collaborates closely for the client's case.
If you need the assistance of an attorney in a situation such as the above, please visit Daeryun Law Firm at any time.

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.








