CONTENTS
- 1. How the Clients Came to the Seoul Law Firm

- - How the Clients Came to the Seoul Law Firm
- - Statutes Relevant to the Case, Explained by the Seoul Law Firm
- - The Seoul Law Firm Explains the Loan Lawsuit
- 2. The Seoul Law Firm's Assistance

- - Seoul Law Firm: Arguing That a Loan Certificate Was Prepared
- - Seoul Law Firm: Arguing That the Defendant Delayed Repayment of the Loan
- - Seoul Law Firm: Arguing That the Defendant Has an Obligation to Return the Loan
- 3. Full Recovery of the Loan Through the Seoul Law Firm's Assistance

- - If You Are Looking for the Seoul Law Firm
1. How the Clients Came to the Seoul Law Firm

The clients were unable to recover a loan from the defendant and asked a Seoul attorney for assistance. The Seoul attorney collaborated with attorneys nationwide to assist the clients.
How the Clients Came to the Seoul Law Firm
The clients were coworkers of the defendant.
The defendant intended to leave the company he was working at and start a business.
Because starting a business required start-up funds, he wanted to borrow them from the clients.
The clients then prepared a loan certificate together with the defendant and lent him the money.
However, the defendant repaid only part of the loan and did not pay the rest after that.
In the end, the clients asked the Seoul law firm for assistance in order to recover the loan.
Statutes Relevant to the Case, Explained by the Seoul Law Firm
The Seoul law firm explained the lawsuit for the return of a loan.
A loan
refers to money that has been lent, and if you have not received such a loan back, you may proceed with a lawsuit for the return of a loan through a civil action.
※ Civil Act Article 598 (Definition of Loan for Consumption)
A loan for consumption becomes effective when one party agrees to transfer to the other party the ownership of money or other substitutes, and the other party agrees to return goods of the same kind, quality, and quantity.
※ Civil Act Article 390 (Default and Damages)
If an obligor fails to effect performance in accordance with the substance of the obligation, the obligee may claim damages. However, this shall not apply if the performance has become impossible without any intention or negligence on the part of the obligor.
※ Civil Act Article 393 (Scope of Damages)
① Damages for default shall be limited to ordinary damages.
② Damages arising from special circumstances shall be subject to compensation only where the obligor knew or could have known of such circumstances.
*If you would like a more thorough review, we recommend seeking a 🔗legal consultation with an attorney.
The Seoul Law Firm Explains the Loan Lawsuit
The Seoul law firm will explain the 🔗lawsuit for the return of a loan in detail.
There are requirements that must be met in order to proceed with a lawsuit for the return of a loan.
1. The fact of a monetary loan-for-consumption contract between the creditor and the debtor
2. The fact that the money was to be repaid within the term
3. In the case of a claim for interest, the fact of an interest agreement
In other words, it is important to confirm whether there is evidence of the claim relationship between the creditor and the debtor.
A loan certificate, if available, will serve as good supporting evidence, but if there is none, other materials proving the monetary transaction are needed.
1. Certified mail: If the debtor does not repay the loan, a certified-mail item is sent urging repayment of the loan.
2. Application for provisional attachment: The creditor may apply for a provisional attachment of the debtor's property before the debtor disposes of it.
3. Application for a payment order: If the debtor acknowledges the debt, an application for a payment order is filed.
4. Proceeding with a civil action: If the debtor denies the debt, a lawsuit for the return of a loan must be filed.
5. Compulsory execution: Once a payment-order decision or a judgment in a civil action has become final, compulsory execution may be carried out against the debtor's property.
The extinctive prescription for a lawsuit for the return of a loan is ten years.
It is necessary to consider whether ten years have passed since the transaction.
2. The Seoul Law Firm's Assistance
After conducting a careful consultation with the clients, the Seoul attorney made the following arguments.
Seoul Law Firm: Arguing That a Loan Certificate Was Prepared
The clients and the defendant prepared a loan certificate proving the fact of the monetary transaction.
The Seoul law firm presented the loan certificate as evidence and argued that the defendant had to return the loan.
Seoul Law Firm: Arguing That the Defendant Delayed Repayment of the Loan
The defendant did not return the loan even though the repayment term had passed.
The Seoul law firm therefore argued that the defendant had not kept to the loan repayment term.
Seoul Law Firm: Arguing That the Defendant Has an Obligation to Return the Loan
The Seoul law firm noted that a debtor has an obligation to return a loan to the creditor.
Accordingly, it emphasized that the defendant had an obligation to return the loan to the client.
3. Full Recovery of the Loan Through the Seoul Law Firm's Assistance
With the assistance of the Seoul attorney, the clients were able to recover the full amount of the loan in the lawsuit for the return of a loan.
If You Are Looking for the Seoul Law Firm
The clients were able to recover the loan from the defendant.
The Seoul attorney collaborates with attorneys nationwide to provide client-tailored solutions through in-person meetings and real-time video conferences.
If you wish to proceed with a lawsuit for the return of a loan, we recommend asking a 🔗Seoul attorney for assistance.

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.










