Page title background (PC version)Page title background (mobile version)

Deals & Cases

Return of deposit

[Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit Success Case] Full Deposit Recovered After Winning a Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit

The client who decided to pursue a jeonse deposit lawsuit had not recovered the deposit from the defendant, who was the lessor, but with the assistance of a Daeryun attorney the client recovered the full deposit.

CONTENTS
  • 1. The Client Who Came for a Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit
    • - The Circumstances That Led to the Decision to Pursue a Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit
    • - Reviewing the Statutes Relevant to a Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit
  • 2. The Daeryun Attorney's Assistance Toward Winning the Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit
    • - In the Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit, the Client Had Clearly Expressed an Intent to Vacate to the Defendant via Messenger Three Months Before the Lease Term Expired
    • - In the Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit, the Defendant as Lessor Had a Duty to Return the Deposit to the Client
    • - Until the Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit, the Defendant Only Relayed Open-Ended Words That the Jeonse Deposit Would Be Returned When a New Tenant Arrived
  • 3. The Full Deposit Recovered by Winning the Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit
    • - If You Need the Help of an Experienced Attorney in a Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit

1. The Client Who Came for a Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit

To seek advice about a jeonse deposit lawsuit, the client visited Daeryun, which has attorneys dedicated to the return of jeonse deposits.

The Circumstances That Led to the Decision to Pursue a Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit

This is the case of a client who won a jeonse deposit lawsuit and recovered the full deposit.

The client entered into a lease agreement with the defendant, who was the landlord, and transferred the jeonse deposit.

The client, starting three months before the lease term ended, finished preparing to move and notified the real estate agent that the jeonse contract would be terminated.

The next day, the defendant received the news and contacted the client to say that the deposit would be returned.

After that, however, even as the date for the expiration of the contract term passed, the defendant did not answer the client's calls, and the real estate agent only relayed open-ended news asking the client to wait until a new tenant moved in.

In the end, the client did not recover the deposit. The client therefore decided to proceed with a jeonse deposit lawsuit and came to a dedicated attorney at Daeryun.

Reviewing the Statutes Relevant to a Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit

■ Statutes Relevant to a Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit

▶ Article 3-2 of the Housing Lease Protection Act (Recovery of the Deposit)

Where a lessee applies for an auction under a final judgment in a lawsuit for the return of the deposit or under any other comparable title of execution, the performance of the counter-obligation or the tender of such performance shall not be a requirement for commencing execution, notwithstanding Article 41 of the Civil Execution Act concerning the requirements for commencing execution.

▶ Article 3-3 of the Housing Lease Protection Act (Order for Registration of a Lease Right)

Where the deposit is not returned after the lease ends, the lessee may apply for an order for registration of the lease right to the District Court, the District Court branch, or the City or County Court having jurisdiction over the location of the leased housing.

Preparation Before Securing a Title of Execution

1. Sending certified mail: to demand return of the deposit

2. Application for provisional attachment: for the purpose of preserving compulsory execution against the lessor's movable or immovable property

2. The Daeryun Attorney's Assistance Toward Winning the Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit

So that the client could recover the full amount through the jeonse deposit lawsuit, the Daeryun attorney drew on dedicated experience in jeonse deposit lawsuits and emphasized the obligation to return the deposit.

In the Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit, the Client Had Clearly Expressed an Intent to Vacate to the Defendant via Messenger Three Months Before the Lease Term Expired

In the jeonse deposit lawsuit, the client noted that, starting three months before the lease term expired, she had expressed her intent to vacate to the real estate agent and the defendant.

The client first expressed her intent to vacate to the real estate agent via messenger, then contacted the defendant once more and received a definite answer regarding the return of the jeonse deposit.

Even though there were circumstances showing that the intent to vacate had been expressed, the defendant did not return the deposit to the client.

The Daeryun attorney accordingly emphasized that the client had expressed her intent to vacate and that there were messenger records serving as clear evidence.

In the Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit, the Defendant as Lessor Had a Duty to Return the Deposit to the Client

In the jeonse deposit lawsuit, the defendant as lessor had a duty to return the deposit to the client but did not fulfill it.

As the contract term expired, the client requested the return of the deposit starting three months in advance but did not receive it.

The Daeryun attorney requested that the defendant, who had not performed the duty to return the deposit under the law, return the full amount in the jeonse deposit lawsuit.

Until the Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit, the Defendant Only Relayed Open-Ended Words That the Jeonse Deposit Would Be Returned When a New Tenant Arrived

In the jeonse deposit lawsuit, the defendant, through the real estate agent, gave a one-sided notice that the jeonse deposit would be returned once a new tenant appeared.

Although the contract term had expired and the client had prepared to move, she did not recover the jeonse deposit because of the defendant's excuses.

The Daeryun attorney argued that the deposit should be returned to the client, who had not recovered the jeonse deposit in the jeonse deposit lawsuit and had received only the defendant's one-sided notice.

3. The Full Deposit Recovered by Winning the Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit

As a result of the jeonse deposit lawsuit, the client was able to recover the full jeonse deposit with the assistance of the Daeryun attorney.

If You Need the Help of an Experienced Attorney in a Jeonse Deposit Lawsuit

This is the case of a client who recovered the full deposit with the assistance of a Daeryun attorney in a jeonse deposit lawsuit.

Daeryun Law Firm made every effort to assist the client in recovering the full jeonse deposit.

If you have concerns about a case like the one above, you may come to Daeryun Law Firm.

Daeryun has organized and dedicated attorney teams in place.

Daeryun Law Firm will continue to provide diligent assistance for its clients.

[전세보증금소송 승소사례] 전세보증금소송 승소하여 보증금 전액 반환

This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Related Information
Background

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's exclusive AI · IT
litigation strategies
Over 260
key members
1,200+ cases
handled monthly

* January 2026 Bar Association Transit Permit Issuance Criteria

*Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 Paragraph 1

Attorney
Legal consultation booking

All consultations are conducted by specialized lawyers after reviewing the case. It is carried out on a reservation basis to ensure a professional process.We encourage you to make an early reservation for consultation, and request adherence to the scheduled time. We will do our best to provide a satisfying consultation.

Phone
consultation 1800-7905

Available 24/7, 365 days
for consultation requests

Phone booking

KakaoTalk
consultation

KakaoTalk channel

Daeryun Law Firm Attorneys

KakaoTalk booking

Online
consultation

We provide tailored
legal services.

Online booking
Quick Menu

KakaoTalk