CONTENTS
- 1. Copyright (C) 2017. All Rights Reserved.
- - Copyright (C) 2014. All Rights Reserved.
- - Claim of the Client
- 2. Copyright (C) 2018. All Rights Reserved.
- - Controversial matter
- - Child pornography possession
- 3. Illegal Aid Content
- 4. Copyright (C) 2016. All Rights Reserved.
1. Copyright (C) 2017. All Rights Reserved.
The client, who violated the Sexual Harassment Act, was regularly accessing obscene posts through SNS, and received a link to an obscene video through a paid Twitter circle.
The video featured people who appeared to be children and teenagers, and it was revealed that the client saved it and then watched it.
This fact is true. As confirmed through a police investigation, he was booked on charges of violating the Acheong Act and was subject to a police investigation.
Copyright (C) 2014. All Rights Reserved.
there's been downloading and watching a specific video link via the usual Telegram and Twitter.
After this, the police was able to transfer the financial accounts and digital devices of the investigator target, and and the video record that was stored in the process of the client's deposit. News /span>
In accordance with this police holds a child·teens appeared drinking and Established anaerobic 61%, 41% );">Pissue checkPissue check Pissue check. News /span>
Claim of the Client
See More
2. Copyright (C) 2018. All Rights Reserved.
Controversial matter
Compact | 내용 |
영상의 명확한 성격 | 문제된 영상이 실제 아동·청소년이 출연한 음란물인지 여부 제목·설명·외형만으로 판단 곤란한 경우도 고려됨 |
고의성 및 반복성 여부 | 의뢰인이 고의로 해당 영상을 시청했는지 반복적인 시청이 있었는지 판단이 필요함 |
유포·제작 여부 | 단순 소지 및 시청인지 아니면 타인에게 전달하거나 유포·제작까지 이르렀는지가 처벌 수위에 큰 영향을 줌 |
Child pornography possession
| 아청법 | 아동·청소년 성착취물을 구입, 소지, 시청한 경우 ▷ 1년 이상의 유기징역 |
범죄 성립 요건 | 실제 아동·청소년이거나 그렇게 인식할 수 있는 인물 또는 표현물 등장 |
성적 행위에 해당하는 범위 | 성교 행위 |
3. Illegal Aid Content
The law-based the trustee the law-enforcement firm the lawyer of the motorcycle claimed the following News /span>
Power | 내용 |
영상의 성격에 대한 불확실성 강조 | 의뢰인은 시청한 영상이 아동·청소년이 등장하는 불법 음란물인지 인지하지 못한 상태에서 시청했다고 주장함
영상이 다른 음란물과 섞여 있어 구별이 어려웠다고 설명함 |
유포 행위 없었음 | 의뢰인은 해당 영상을 단순히 시청한 것일 뿐 유포하거나 제작한 사실은 없다고 주장 |
재범방지노력 | 아동·청소년 성착취물에 대한 법 위반의 심각성을 인식하고 반성문 총 10차례 전달
성폭력예방프로그램 자발적 이수 |
4. Copyright (C) 2016. All Rights Reserved.
News /span>
Law firm Law firm's lawyers Loyalty to prove that the same behavior will not be repeated; Emergency prevention program Emergency Data Emergency Emergency
Rissue Rissue Rissue could provide opportunities for resocialization through training. News <% var comment path = (typeof window == 'undefined') ? '/fcv/tpl/comments/' : ''; list = list.reverse(); var showMore = (comment.total cnt > 3) %>
This content is based on actual case studies of Daeryun Law LLC with some adaptations, and the copyright belongs to our firm.
Unauthorized reproduction, duplication, or distribution and other copyright infringements may result in legal action under applicable laws.
