Assistance from the Pyeongtaek Forcible Indecent Act Attorney | Defending Against Imprisonment for a Forcible Indecent Act with the Assistance of the Pyeongtaek Forcible Indecent Act Attorney

A crime such as the forcible indecent act at issue in this case is classified as one of the sexual violence crimes.

A sexual violence crime refers to a crime falling under any one of the following.

△The crime of arranging sexual intercourse

△The crime of distributing obscene materials and the like

△The crime of manufacturing obscene materials and the like

△Public indecency

△Rape and its attempt

△Imitative rape and its attempt

△Forcible indecent act and its attempt

△Quasi-rape, quasi-indecent act by compulsion, and their attempts

△Rape and the like causing bodily injury or resulting in injury

△Rape and the like causing death or resulting in death

△The crime of sexual intercourse with a minor and the like

△The crime of sexual intercourse by abuse of occupational authority and the like

△The crime of sexual intercourse with or an indecent act against a minor

△The crime of robbery-rape, and others

A person who commits a sexual violence crime may be subject to a criminal penalty or to dispositions such as probation, community service, or an order to attend a course.

Among these, a person who commits a forcible indecent act such as the one in this case is subject to imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine not exceeding 15 million won, with attempts also punishable.

The Pyeongtaek forcible indecent act attorney heard the testimony of the other coworkers who had attended the dinner with the client.

The coworkers stated that when the client was about to touch the alleged victim as a sign of friendliness, he asked for the victim's consent; that the victim had described the dinner as having a “playful” atmosphere; that the client made no sexual remarks whatsoever; and that, although it was said the victim strongly disliked physical contact, the victim had in the past first initiated physical contact, such as grabbing another coworker's arm.

The coworkers of the client who requested the help of the Pyeongtaek forcible indecent act attorney even voluntarily prepared and submitted petitions to reveal the truth, despite the risk of disadvantage to themselves.

At the time the incident occurred, the client held the position of team leader.

The victim therefore argued that the client had used his position as team leader to obtain the coworkers' petitions.

However, at the time the coworkers prepared the petitions, the client had already been demoted from team leader to team member, and the victim's claim was entirely contrary to the facts.