Press Coverage

Daeryun Law Firm announced on the 17th that it has signed an MOU with the Korea Law Academy and established a support model for nurturing professional talent in the legal affairs field and linking employment. The signing ceremony held on the 12th at Daeryun Law Firm's main office located in Park One, Yeouido, was attended by Park Dong-il, CEO of Daeryun Law Firm, and Korea Law Academy CEO Yang Sang-won and Director Lee Jong-hyeon. Korea Law Academy is an excellent training institution that has ranked first in the employment rate and number of employed people in the legal affairs field for 10 consecutive years from 2016 to this year, focusing on differentiated educational content and practice under the goal of ‘employing all trainees.’ It has been leading the industry through programs. In particular, it has been recognized for its reputation for practical education based on employment performance, such as being selected as an excellent training institution among domestic legal training institutions three times in a row, and awarded an appreciation plaque as an institution with an excellent employment rate by the Seoul Southern Employment Branch. Based on this MOU, both organizations plan to provide various practical opportunities in fields related to talent training. Specifically, we plan to assist in ▶ planning a curriculum centered on basic legal office job competencies and service mind, ▶ case-based practical training to strengthen adaptability to the field, and ▶ strengthening employment linkage based on talent matching. Yang Sang-won, CEO of Korea Law School, said, “Not only professionalism, but also attitude towards customers and service mind are important for legal clerks,” adding, “Through cooperation with Daeryun, we will help trainees settle down stably in the law firm field and start their careers. “We will help,” said Dong-il Park, CEO of Daeryun Law Firm. “Daeryun is driving customer satisfaction by providing customer-centered legal services and operating an innovative work system.” He also said, “Through this MOU, we will strengthen the practical talent training system and further improve the quality of legal services.” Meanwhile, Daeryun Law Firm is striving to strengthen the quality of legal services by continuously upgrading the digital-based work environment, including the introduction of an AI consultation system and an internal litigation support platform. [Law Leader] Reporter Son Dong-wook twson@lawleader.co.kr Daeryun Law Firm signs MOU with Korea Law Academy... “Establishment of a legal affairs talent training system” (link)

Songpa Police Station conducts investigation into complainant... Afterwards, the police, who were transferred to the Seoul Metropolitan Government, began a full-fledged investigation into the case in which former CEO Park Dae-joon and Coupang Corporation were sued in relation to Coupang's large-scale customer information leak. According to News 1's coverage on the 17th, Seoul Songpa Police Station summoned lawyer Jang Ji-woon of Daeryun Law Firm on the 11th to represent Mr. A, who sued Coupang Co., Ltd., former CEO Park, and Coupang's certification agent and certification manager on charges of violation of the Personal Information Protection Act and professional breach of trust. The police investigated. It was found that on the same day, the police confirmed the allegations of personal information leakage and professional breach of trust that were stated in the complaint regarding Coupang's customer information leak incident against Attorney Jang. Previously, Daeryun said in the complaint, "As managers and managers in charge of personal information processing, they neglected their duty to take safety measures to prevent information leakage," and "The person in charge leaked personal information without returning the authentication key even after leaving the company." He continued, "The managers also did not retrieve the authentication key of the person who left the company or “They did not take any action, such as replacing the authentication key.” Meanwhile, Songpa Police Station transferred the case to the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency after investigating the complainant. Currently, this case is being investigated by the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency Cyber Investigation Unit. Reporter Han Su-hyeon (shan@news1.kr), Reporter Kwon Jin-young (realkwon@news1.kr)[View full article] News 1 - [Exclusive] Police investigate in earnest the case of former CEO Park Dae-joon and other defendants in the 'Coupang incident' (Go here) Asia Economy - Police begin investigation into the case of former CEO Park Dae-joon and others accused in the 'Coupang incident' (Go here) Kyunghyang Shinmun - Police begin full-fledged investigation into management of ‘Coupang incident’... Transferred to Seoul Office after investigation of accuser (link) Hankyoreh - Police investigate complainant of Coupang Corporation and former CEO Park Dae-joon for ‘personal information leak’ (Click here) News Pim - Police begin investigation into former Coupang CEO Park Dae-joon's case accused of 'personal information leak' (Go here) Money Today - Police investigate accuser Park Dae-joon, former CEO of 'Coupang personal information leak' (link) Point Daily - Police begin investigation into ‘Coupang personal information leak’… Complainant investigation source (link)

A company that violated the Waste Management Act three times... District office, 'each disposition' according to violation, court says "Defendant's disposition standard is the administrative office's 'business handling rules'... disposal suitability and law must be followed" The court ruled that even if the fines are added up for multiple violations, the fine in lieu of business suspension cannot exceed the upper limit set by law. Last October, the 4-3 administrative division of the Seoul High Court filed a lawsuit against the head of Yeonsu-gu District Office in Incheon by waste disposal company A and others. The appellate court overturned the original judgment and ruled to cancel the fine imposed on the plaintiffs in the appeal of the case for cancellation of administrative disposition for violation of the Waste Management Act. Company A and others received a fine in lieu of business suspension equivalent to 6% of sales from Yeonsu-gu for violating three regulations under the Waste Management Act in 2023, including not attaching and not carrying waste collection/transportation permits. The fine for these companies' violations is 1% of sales. It was 2%, and the district made this decision based on the standard that 'when there is more than one violation, each is disposed of according to the violation.' However, Company A and others were dissatisfied with the result and filed an administrative lawsuit. However, the court of first instance dismissed the plaintiff's claim, saying that there was no problem in the process of calculating the amount of the fine. Accordingly, Company A and others stipulated that the fine in lieu of business suspension in accordance with Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Waste Management Act should not exceed 5% of sales. An appeal was filed, claiming that the fines could only be levied on the line. The court of the second trial ruled in favor of the plaintiff. The appellate court said, “The regulations presented by the defendant as standards for disposal are nothing more than rules for handling affairs within the administrative office. Since they do not have the effect of binding the public or the court, the appropriateness of disposal must follow the provisions of the Waste Management Act.” At the same time, “Same as the method calculated by the defendant, the sales amount is calculated by calculating fines for each violation and then simply adding them up.” “A fine exceeding 5% cannot be imposed,” he said, adding, “However, since the court cannot directly set the fine, we have no choice but to cancel the entire fine.” Attorney Shin Jong-soo of Daeryun Law Firm, who represented the plaintiff in the appeal, said, “According to the Waste Management Act, the fine in lieu of one month of business suspension is 2% of sales, 3 months is 3%, and 6 months is 3%. “It is 5%,” he said. “If there are multiple violations equivalent to 1 month and a fine is imposed by simply adding them up, an unreasonable result will occur where the fine is imposed in an amount that replaces 3 or 6 months of business suspension.”[View full article] “Laws take precedence over internal regulations”... fines for waste disposal companies, appeals ‘cancelled’ (link)

A man in his 20s, who was sentenced to prison in the first trial for sexually assaulting a drunken acquaintance, was acquitted in the appeal trial. According to the legal community on the 16th, the Chuncheon 1st Criminal Division of the Seoul High Court overturned the first trial ruling and declared him not guilty in the appeal trial of Mr. A, a man in his 20s who was put on trial on charges of quasi-rape in October. Mr. A got drunk while drinking together at the house of Mr. B, an acquaintance, in 2021. He was indicted on charges of following Mr. B into the room and sexually assaulting him, and was sentenced to 2 years and 6 months in prison in the first trial. Mr. A denied the charges, saying he had never had sexual relations with Mr. B. In addition, it was argued that Mr. B's statement was different at each stage of the investigation and was unreliable given that he described the damage in such detail that it was difficult to say that he was drunk. However, the first trial judged that Mr. B's statement was so specific and natural that he could not say it without directly experiencing it, and determined that there had been sexual intercourse between the two. Although some loss of memory may occur over time, the core part is that the credibility can be recognized by consistently stating the facts. The appellate court's judgment was different. The court said that Mr. B's statements regarding sexual relations were consistent and detailed, so it was difficult to reject them, but that it could not be concluded that he was in a drunken state of mind or body or was incapable of resisting. Although the amount of alcohol consumed at the time exceeded the usual amount of alcohol, it was not enough to cause loss of consciousness as it was consumed slowly over several hours, and the victim of sexual assault was described in detail by Mr. A, including how he took off his clothes and his words and actions. When Mr. B was questioned by his boyfriend about his relationship with Mr. A, he sued Mr. A, and the court ruled that it is difficult to rule out the possibility that Mr. B gave a defensive response and exaggerated the situation somewhat, or that he expressed feelings of victimization under the influence of his boyfriend. I saw it. Lee Ji-yeon, an attorney at the Daeryun Law Firm who represented Mr. A at the appellate trial, said, "If the victim's statement serves as evidence of guilt because there is no direct evidence to admit the facts of the indictment, there must be no reasonable doubt about the contents. We emphasized that the credibility of the statement is low based on the fact that the statement was changed at each stage of the trial, whether Mr. B was too drunk to resist at the time." Reporter Jeong Cheol-wook[View full article] A 20-year-old sentenced to prison for sexually assaulting a drunken acquaintance was found not guilty on appeal (link)

Chairman Kim Beom-seok and other three people did not attend on the 17th... Lawmakers from the ruling and opposition parties propose amendments such as 'strengthening representative responsibility' and announcing follow-up measures... Democratic Party "Prepares fundamental measures" Ahead of the National Assembly Science, Technology, Information and Communication Committee (Over-Defense) hearing on the 17th regarding the large-scale personal information leak, a 'half-length' hearing is expected as the three key members of Coupang submitted written reasons for non-attendance. According to political circles and industry sources on the 15th, the previous day, Kim Beom-seok Inc. The Chairman, Kang Han-seung, head of North American business development, and former CEO Dae-joon Park submitted a written statement explaining their absence from the hearing. Previously, at a plenary meeting on the 9th, the Committee decided to hold a hearing on the Coupang infringement incident at 10 a.m. on the 17th, and adopted six people as witnesses, including Chairman Kim, former CEO Park, General Manager Kang, Coupang CISO Brat Metis, Coupang Vice President of External Cooperation Min Byeong-gi, and Coupang Vice President of National Assembly and Government Affairs Cho Yong-woo. However, As the three people expressed their intention to not appear, the National Assembly announced that it plans to take legal action and other related decisions on the day of the hearing. A political official said, "As both ruling and opposition party lawmakers believe that the reason for non-appearance is inappropriate, a decision is expected to be made as the hearing progresses." He added, "Under the current law, mandatory attendance cannot be requested, so it will proceed as scheduled, focusing on witnesses such as Coupang's CISO." According to the National Assembly Testimony Appraisal Act, a request for witness attendance at a hearing can be made regardless of nationality or residence. Yes (Article 5). Failure to appear without a justifiable reason is subject to criminal punishment (Article 12), and the National Assembly may report the party who failed to appear to the investigative agency (Article 15). However, an accompanying order (Article 6) may be issued to the party to force attendance, but the accompanying order is limited to the National Assembly inspection. In fact, this hearing will be reduced to the attendance of Harold Rogers, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel of Coupang Inc., the 'Interim Representative for the 7th Day', and Brat Metis, Coupang CISO. Of course, Chairman Kim and others can express their intention to attend by resolving the reason for non-attendance. A statement of reasons for a witness's non-appearance must be submitted at least 3 days prior to the hearing, but there is no deadline for the intent to appear. However, according to the National Assembly, there has never been a case like this so far. Ji-woon Jang, a lawyer at Daeryun Law Firm, said, "It is unclear whether a proper investigation can be conducted against foreigners living abroad even if criminal charges are filed for non-appearance," and added, "We have no choice but to expect Chairman Kim himself to appear voluntarily depending on public opinion pressure or political judgment." Pressure on 'offensive crimes' is also expected. According to the National Assembly Bill Information System, People Power Party lawmaker Lee Man-hee and others proposed a bill to partially amend the Personal Information Protection Act, which stipulates that the current law (Article 64), which stipulates the standard for imposing fines for personal information leaks as 'less than 3/100 of total sales', should be raised to 6/100 of sales compared to major countries such as the United States. Park Beom-gye Representatives of the Democratic Party of Korea and others also proposed expanding the scope of group lawsuits (Article 51) and introducing fines for repetitive and serious personal information infringement incidents that allow for fines to be imposed within the range of 10% of total sales (newly established in Article 64-2 (2)). People Power Party lawmaker Kim Sang-hoon also proposed an amendment aimed at clarifying the responsibilities of representatives and strengthening the role of the personal information protection manager (Article 31). It was proposed. In a statement on the 14th, the National Assembly members including Choi Min-hee, Kim Hyun, Kim Woo-young, Noh Jong-myeon, Lee Joo-hee, Lee Jeong-heon, Lee Hoon-ki, Jeong Dong-young, Jo In-cheol, Han Min-soo, and Hwang Jeong-ah said, "The 'reason for the failure of the three Coupang witnesses' to appear cannot be condoned as an act of deceiving the Korean people," adding, "Chairman Kim 'resides overseas', former CEO Kang 'is not in a responsible position', and former Park The representative cited 'health reasons' and criticized it as "arrogance that ignores the people and an act that cuts off trust with the people." He added, "We will immediately push for legislation to prevent recurrence, such as strengthening governance responsibility, reinforcing attendance obligations, and establishing a response system for those responsible for staying abroad." Park Soo-hyun, chief spokesperson for the Democratic Party of Korea, met with reporters after the Supreme Committee meeting on this day and said, "We hope that the actual founder will make a responsible statement to the public, but we stand with the people for the fact that they have been avoiding it for over 10 years." “The party is also angry,” he said. “However, I understand that there is no means of coercion within the current National Assembly system, and the party will do its best to address the damage caused by the Coupang issue and to fundamentally address the issues.” Reporter Kim Myeong-shin (lila@news1.kr), Reporter Cho So-young (cho11757@news1.kr)[View full article] Coupang's 'half' hearing missing the key... What is the direction of the political world's 'sin of shame' (link)

Korea’s first ‘distance lifelong education center’ to provide legal and HR lectures - Daeryun “We plan to actively pursue talent matching through service-oriented education” Daeryun Law Firm announced on the 12th that it signed an MOU (business agreement) with Barun Career Co., Ltd., a legal HR professional organization, to foster legal professionals. The signing ceremony was held on the 10th in the conference room of Daeryun Yeouido main office, with Daeryun CEO Park Dong-il, Barun Career CEO Ji-woong Shin, and Barun Career CEO Seo-yoon Lee. It was held with the participation of the head of the division and other working-level staff. Bareun Career is a legal practice training institution that provides practical training and career consulting to those preparing for employment in the legal and business fields, and produces a large number of legal affairs talents into the field every year. Currently, a large number of legal contents are provided through Barun Law HR Academy and Barun Law HR Distance Lifelong Education Center. Through this MOU, Daeryun plans to strengthen its continuous talent training model that leads to training, employment, and job settlement. In particular, the basic practical competencies, such as the service mind, basic work attitude, customer communication competency, and accuracy of record and document management, which are most important in law firm work, are reflected in the training course to foster talent needed in the actual field and increase recruitment efficiency. Through this agreement, the two companies will △ plan a curriculum centered on the basic job competency and service spirit of legal clerks △ case-based practical training to increase field adaptability △ strengthen employment linkage based on talent matching △ jointly promote and operate programs. We plan to pursue this in stages. Shin Ji-woong, CEO of Bareun Career, said, "For legal clerks, not only professionalism, but also attitude toward customers and service mind are important. Through cooperation with Daeryun, we will help trainees settle into their jobs more stably." Park Dong-il, CEO of Daeryun Law Firm, said, "Daeryun is a law firm that has operated a practical, systematic work system, and it is significant in nurturing the talent needed in the field." He added, "This agreement will serve as an opportunity for legal clerks. “We will raise the level of education and discover talent suitable for law firm work,” he said. Reporter Cheon Ju-young (young1997@mydaily.co.kr)[View full article] Daeryun signs MOU with Proper Career to foster legal professionals (Click here)

The number of applicants for a class action lawsuit against the U.S. Coupang headquarters in connection with a large-scale personal information leak, including many citizens and permanent residents, has exceeded 2,300. According to SJKP LLP, a law firm partnering with Daeryun Law Firm on the 12th, a total of 2,346 applicants expressed their intention to participate in the U.S. class action lawsuit as of 10 a.m. on the 12th. SJKP held a press conference in New York, U.S. on the 8th of this month (local time) and filed a class action suit. Registration has started. It is reported that many of the applicants include U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and residents. Daeryun expects the number of participants to increase in the future as many of the applicants for domestic class action lawsuits that were previously in progress have announced that they will also participate in the U.S. lawsuit. Cases of damage received so far by SJKP include △ spam texts disguised as promotions for part-time Coupang logistics jobs △ calls informing participants of event participation impersonating Coupang △ notifications of Coupang login attempts from other countries and unknown devices. SJKP aims to cooperate with Daeryun to submit the complaint to the U.S. court within the year, and additional applicants are being accepted through the official websites of SJKP and Daeryun. New York attorney Son Dong-hu, who is leading this class action lawsuit, said, "The complaint is currently in the final stages of preparation, and we are analyzing the victims' cases and reviewing their suitability as plaintiffs in the U.S. federal court." He added, “Through the discovery system, we will reveal that the U.S. headquarters has been exercising core authority over security and risk investments and hold them accountable for poor management and supervision.” Kim Kuk-il, CEO of Daeryun Management, explained, “U.S. lawsuits are proceeded without separate down payment due to the nature of the local litigation structure.” He said, "We will do our best to ensure that victims can seek their rights as consumers in the courts of both Korea and the United States without burden and to sound a strong warning to Coupang, which is still busy avoiding responsibility." Reporter Lee Yong-seong (utility@sedaily.com)[View full article] Seoul Economic Daily - Coupang US class action lawsuit applicants exceed 2,300 in three days (Go here) Yonhap Infomax - The number of applicants for a class action lawsuit against Coupang's U.S. headquarters exceeds 2,300... “Goal of submitting complaint within the year” (link) Yonhap News - Applicants for class-action lawsuit against Coupang in U.S. exceed 2,300 (Shortcut) Sejeong Ilbo - SJKP “More than 2,300 applicants for Coupang class action lawsuit… expected to increase further” (link) Miju JoongAng Ilbo - Coupang class action lawsuit filed by more than 2,300 people (link)

Early termination of lease contract... 'Landlord's fault vs. lessee's fault' The court said, "The protection period for recovery of key money does not apply... Circumstances of unauthorized subletting by tenants" Even if a commercial lease contract was terminated midway, if there was no clear agreement on the end point, the court ruled that the protection period for recovery of key money should be based on the end date of the first contract. Last October, the Jeju District Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim in a rental deposit lawsuit filed by self-employed person A against building owner B. Person A last October In 2022, he signed a commercial lease contract with Mr. B for a three-year contract period, but due to personal circumstances, he requested cancellation a few months after signing. Mr. B complied, and the two parties reached an agreement on the premise of terminating the contract. Afterwards, Mr. A found a new tenant, signed a key money contract, and even coordinated the schedule for signing the lease agreement between Mr. B and the new tenant. However, a problem arose when Mr. B changed his existing position and refused to sign the lease contract. Mr. B said that he would use the commercial building himself. This is because he refused to sign a contract with the new tenant. Mr. A claimed that this hindered his opportunity to recover the deposit. In addition, he demanded payment of approximately 30 million won, claiming that Mr. B did not return part of the deposit without his consent. Mr. B refuted this. The notice was that the contract was terminated because Mr. A had sub-leased part of the store to a third party without permission. It was emphasized that the date of the key money contract signed by Mr. A did not fall within the key money recovery protection period under the Commercial Lease Act. The court ruled in Mr. B's favor. The court said, "It is difficult to say that there was a specific agreement on the end of the lease in the agreement process between the two sides," and "The key money recovery protection period is from six months before the end of the first contract until the end, so the defendant's sabotage “It does not fall within this period,” he said. He added, “It has been confirmed that the plaintiff ran a ‘Shop and Shop’ type advertisement with the intention of subletting part of the building. This is subletting without consent, and the defendant is not liable for damages under the Commercial Lease Act.” He added, “The rental deposit that was not returned by the defendant is justified because it deducted the cost of restoration to its original state.” Attorney Kim Dong-hwan of Daeryun Law Firm, who represented Mr. B, said, “Mr. “From the beginning, we had no intention of recognizing Mr. A’s right to sublease, so we had a ‘sublease prohibition clause’ at the time of the lease contract,” he explained. “Not only was it not a period during which protection for collection of key money was recognized under the Commercial Lease Act, but the fact of unauthorized sublease also constitutes a reason to exclude this obligation, so the claim related to key money itself was groundless. #Tenant #Rights #Claim dismissed.” Park Seok-ho (haitai2000@ikbc.co.kr)[View full article] Tenant claims "I was prevented from recovering the deposit"... Why is the law dismissing the claim? (Shortcut)

A corporate executive who was accused of embezzling 1.8 billion won of company money was cleared by the prosecution. According to the legal community on the 11th, the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office decided not to indict Mr. A, a man in his 40s, who was transferred on charges of embezzlement under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes. Mr. A was accused of embezzling 1.8 billion won while working as a co-CEO at a manufacturing company run by Mr. B, who is in his 40s, from 2014 to 2019. Mr. B claimed that Mr. A received a false tax invoice from a paper company without actually transacting goods, remitted the company money, and received it back into his personal account. In response, Mr. A claimed that although it was true that he had raised funds using false tax invoices, it was for the company to give rebates to major clients, and that it was all done under the instructions and approval of Mr. B. The prosecution found that the funds raised were actually delivered in cash to the person in charge of the client, and ruled that Mr. A was not guilty as there was no evidence of personal use. In addition, it was determined that Mr. A was not guilty as Mr. B received a notification message when transferring company funds and was aware of the flow of funds, such as directly managing the OTP. Attorney Shin Min-soo of Daeryun Law Firm, who represented Mr. A, said, “For a crime of embezzlement to be established, the intent to illegally obtain property by disposing of other people’s property as if it were one’s own must be proven. In this case, Mr. B sued Mr. A to protect his business interests by shifting responsibility for the rebate conflict that arose between business partners. “We were able to clear the charges by objectively proving that the funds raised by Mr. A were used for the company’s operating profits,” he explained. Reporter Jeong Cheol-wook[View full article]

Establishment of a ‘one-stop’ system from field-oriented training to employment linkage... Maximizing recruitment efficiency Daeryun “We will foster talent to provide more accurate and efficient legal services.” Daeryun Law Firm signed an MOU with the Central Legal Affairs Education Academy and announced on the 11th that it has established a strategic partnership for nurturing practical legal talent and linking employment based on Legal Tech. The signing ceremony held at Daeryun Law Firm’s headquarters office at Park One Law Firm in Yeouido, Seoul on the 4th was attended by Byeong-Jun Ko of Daeryun Law Firm. The CEO and Central Legal Affairs Education Academy's Director Byeong-ho Han and Manager Yeon-hwa Hong were in attendance. The Central Legal Affairs Education Academy is Korea's leading legal practice training institution that combines group education and distance education and produces about 600 legal clerks into the field every year. Through this MOU, Daeryun Law Firm plans to build a continuous legal talent development model that continues from practice, employment, and job settlement based on field-oriented education. We plan to strengthen practical capabilities by combining our own Legal Tech development capabilities and unrivaled litigation system into the curriculum. Specifically, we plan to cooperate in various fields such as ▶ jointly developing electronic litigation and AI-based document practical training courses, ▶ establishing a practical learning platform incorporating litigation quality management standards, and ▶ promoting cooperation between the two organizations. In particular, we will jointly plan customized training courses based on the demand for specialized fields required by Daeryun, and through the academy system when demand for manpower arises. The plan is to maximize recruitment efficiency by immediately supporting resume matching and talent placement. Director Byeong-ho Han of the Central Law Office Education Academy said, “We will continue to produce professional legal talent who can be immediately utilized in the field,” and “We will lead the expansion of expertise in the legal industry based on cooperation with Daeryun.” Ko Byeong-jun, CEO of Daeryun Law Firm, said, “Daeryun is the first law firm in Korea to establish a litigation quality service system based on an American system, and will provide more accurate and efficient legal services through this MOU. “We will foster talent together,” he said, adding, “It will be the starting point of legal service innovation that simultaneously realizes the introduction of legal tech and securing excellent talent.” Meanwhile, Daeryun Law Firm is focusing its capabilities on strengthening legal service expertise by actively introducing legal tech in line with the rapidly changing legal market environment, such as developing and operating ‘AI Daeryun’, an AI-based legal consultation chatbot. Reporter Son Dong-wook, Law Leader twson@lawleader.co.kr Daeryun Law Firm, MOU with Central Law Office Education Academy... ‘Nurturing practical talent based on legal tech’ (Go here)