Client Reviews
Cyber School Violence | Reported for Cyber School Violence Amid a Dating Conflict, We Obtained a "No Action" Decision
ⓘThe client reviews posted on this page are selected from clients who were satisfied with their case outcomes and consented to publication. New reviews will be added on an ongoing basis.
If you would like to learn more specific details, you may review them during an in-person consultation, within the scope of de-identified personal information.
The Client Who Requested a Response to Cyber School Violence
The client who requested a consultation regarding cyber school violence was a parent of a middle school student.
While dating a female student at the same school, the client's child broke up with her due to an emotional conflict.
Ultimately the two split up, and the client's child spread unfavorable rumors about the other student to friends.
The female student reported the client's child for school violence, citing the spreading of rumors and other reasons.
Accordingly, the client inquired about a response strategy to prevent the child from receiving cyber school violence measures.
Result of the Cyber School Violence Response, No Action

After reviewing the cyber school violence case, the school violence attorney explained the overall background of the incident: that a conflict arose during the process of the two students dating and breaking up, and that this emotional confrontation led to the report.
The attorney also emphasized that the client's child had explained and apologized to the other student regarding the problematic matters, and that the other student had accepted this.
In particular, the attorney actively demonstrated that there was no basis to conclude the client's child had personally made some of the rumors at issue, and that part of the content had been exaggerated as the story was passed among students.
As a result of this assistance, the client's child was able to receive a 'No Action decision' in the cyber school violence case.
The client expressed gratitude, saying the child had been relieved of the burden of possibly receiving school violence measures and could return to ordinary school life.
Daeryun, Korea's 9th-ranked law firm (based on 2025 National Tax Service VAT filings), reviews the specific facts of school violence cases and the background of conflicts between the parties to determine a response direction suited to each matter.
If you find yourself in a situation similar to the client in this case, we encourage you to review your response options through a consultation.
⚠️Advertising using false or fabricated client reviews is subject to strict sanctions and penalties under the Korean Bar Association's regulations.
If you suspect a review is false or fabricated, please verify its authenticity and report it to the relevant authorities. This is an important step in maintaining trust in the legal services market.
Consult in other languages
Popular Columns
View moreSchool Violence Committee Dispositions: Procedures, Measures No. 1 Through No. 9, and How to Address the School Record

Sentencing Levels for Juvenile Crime and Types of Crimes Committed by Children Exempt from Criminal Punishment

Levels of School Violence Disciplinary Measures, and the Standards for Disciplinary Determinations

Protective Disposition for a Status Offender Under the Age of Criminal Responsibility: Does It Create a Criminal Record?

How to Respond When Identified as a Perpetrator of School Violence, and a Look at the Types of School Violence

Do you have more questions?
In-Person Consultation Booking
If you have legal concerns, consult with a specialist attorney at the nearest office.










