Deals & Cases

Hit-and-run causing injury
Hit-and-run causing injuryNon-prosecution

Traffic Accident Dedicated Attorney | Non-Prosecution for a Driver Facing Punishment for Hit-and-Run Causing Injury

The client who came to a traffic accident dedicated attorney was in a situation where, after leaving the scene without being aware that a traffic accident had occurred, the client was facing punishment for violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes (hit-and-run causing injury).

1. What Were the Circumstances of the Traffic Accident Dedicated Attorney's Case

The client who came to a traffic accident dedicated attorney was in a state of having been booked on a charge of violation of the “Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes,” that is, violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes (hit-and-run causing injury), after leaving the scene following a traffic accident.

The Situation at the Time of the Traffic Accident

The client, who operates a taxi business, was driving on a main road near home during the daytime and changed lanes from the second lane to the first lane while driving.

Continuing to drive, the client noticed a motorcycle that had fallen over behind, but continued driving without giving it much thought.

A short time later, the client received a call from the police saying that the client had been reported for hit-and-run causing injury, and, gripped by the fear that the client might face criminal punishment even though there had been no fault on the client's part at the time, the client came to a traffic accident dedicated attorney.

Traffic Accident Dedicated Attorney

2. The Traffic Accident Dedicated Attorney's Legal Advice

Unlike an ordinary case of failure to take measures after an accident, hit-and-run causing injury, to which a charge of violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes applies, can result in heavy criminal punishment, so the traffic accident dedicated attorney reviewed the case carefully.

The traffic accident dedicated attorney responded by meticulously reviewing whether this case fell within the constituent elements of the crime.

According to the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes, where a driver who caused a traffic accident through the driver's own fault flees without taking measures, such as rescuing a victim injured or killed in that accident, the driver is subject to aggravated punishment.

In order to determine whether a driver left the accident scene for the purpose of fleeing, the circumstances and details of the accident, the location and degree of the victim's injuries, the degree of the driver's fault, the age and gender of the driver and the victim, and the circumstances after the accident must be comprehensively considered.

The place where the traffic accident occurred at the time was a zone with a speed limit of 50 km, and the client was driving at a constant speed in accordance with the speed limit, had not consumed alcohol, and had not neglected the duty to keep a lookout ahead.

The Most Important Factor Is the ‘Intent to Flee’

To establish the offense of causing injury under Article 5-3, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the , the intent to flee must be proven.

The intent to flee is established when the suspect has 'the awareness of the act and the intention to carry it out, namely, fleeing without taking any measures despite knowing that the accident in this case occurred through his own negligence.'

The attorney handling the traffic accident case argued that the client had no intent to flee, because the client had never thought that the accident occurred through his own negligence.

At the time of the accident, the client changed lanes because a motorcycle was speeding and closely following from behind, and he did not realize that the motorcycle was also changing lanes after him.

Emphasis on the Other Party's Negligence Based on the Objective Circumstances

On the other hand, the motorcycle that caused the accident did not observe the speed limit, and it was negligent in maintaining a safe distance from the vehicle ahead and in keeping a proper lookout.

The client did not activate his turn signal when changing lanes, but a safe distance from the motorcycle following behind was maintained.

Because the motorcycle did not collide with the client's vehicle, the client recognized only the fact that the motorcycle behind him had fallen.

The attorney handling the traffic accident case argued that the client was driving normally, whereas the motorcycle bore the negligence for the accident.

3. The ‘Non-Prosecution’ Result Achieved by the Attorney Handling the Traffic Accident Case

The attorney emphasized that, because the client was driving in compliance with the road traffic laws at the time the accident occurred, it was difficult for him to connect his own lane change with the motorcycle's accident.

In the end, the attorney's argument was accepted, the client received a non-prosecution decision for the violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes (hit-and-run causing injury), and the client was able to avoid a severe punishment.

4. Information on Hit-and-Run Causing Injury Explained by the Attorney Handling the Traffic Accident Case

Unlike an ordinary failure to take measures after a traffic accident, hit-and-run causing injury is classified as a serious traffic crime.

The key requirements for hit-and-run causing injury are as follows.

When Is Hit-and-Run Causing Injury Established?

Under Article 5-3, Paragraph 1 of the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes, where the driver of a vehicle causes death or injury to a person through a traffic accident and flees without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures such as aiding the victim, hit-and-run causing injury or hit-and-run causing death is applied depending on the result.

Hit-and-run causing injuryFleeing without taking aid measures after injuring a person in a traffic accident
Hit-and-run causing deathFleeing after causing the death of a person in a traffic accident


Where hit-and-run causing injury is recognized, the offender is subject to imprisonment for a definite term of at least one year or a fine of at least 5 million won and not more than 30 million won.

The five constituent requirements of hit-and-run causing injury

Occurrence of a traffic accidentConstitutes a traffic accident under the Road Traffic Act
Occurrence of bodily injuryMere property damage does not qualify; there must be a bodily injury requiring treatment
Possibility of recognizing the accident and the harmThe driver recognized, or could have recognized, the fact that the accident occurred
Breach of the duty to provide aidFailing to immediately stop, check the victim's condition, report the accident, and take other necessary measures at the time of the accident
FlightIntentionally leaving the scene

Points to Note When Hit-and-Run Causing Injury Is Applied

Even where the victim sustains only a very minor injury, the charge of hit-and-run causing injury may be established, and even if the driver voluntarily reports the accident after it occurs, the driver remains subject to punishment.

However, as in this case, where the driver did not recognize the accident and had no intent to flee, it is possible to seek the assistance of an attorney handling traffic accident cases from the early stage in order to devise a response strategy.

If you are in a similar situation, because even a slight difference may change the way the law is applied and the future course of events, professional assistance is necessary.

If you are facing concerns related to such a case, please seek a consultation through the 🔗Traffic Accident Attorney Legal Consultation Booking.

교통사고전담변호사 | 도주치상 처벌 위기의 운전자 불기소

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Hit-and-run causing injury: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney ChanWoo JEONG

ChanWoo JEONG

T. 070-5221-2387

criminal lawyer

Attorney HyeonSu KIM

HyeonSu KIM

T. 070-7510-2018

Daegu Metropolitan Police Agency Seongseong Police Station Executive Experience as Seoul City Audit Committee Investigation Officer

Attorney Soyeong GWAK

Soyeong GWAK

T. 070-5221-2805

criminal lawyer

Attorney Gwan Hun BYEON

Gwan Hun BYEON

T. 070-7510-1755

criminal lawyer

Attorney DongGoo Kim

DongGoo Kim

T. 070-5221-3616

criminal lawyer

Attorney DaSom Yoon

DaSom Yoon

T. 070-7510-2139

criminal lawyer

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Special (Aggravated) Assault | Client Facing Risk of an Actual Sentence Receives a Suspended Sentence Through Attorney Assistance

Next

Embezzlement Attorney | Embezzlement Attorney, Case of Defending a Suspended Sentence for Occupational Embezzlement of 70 Million Won

View list
Quick Menu

Chat