Deals & Cases

Violation of the Road Traffic Act (hit-and-run injury)
Violation of the Road Traffic Act (hit-and-run injury)Non-prosecution

Incheon Hit-and-Run Attorney Assistance | Incheon Attorney Who Obtained a Non-Prosecution Decision for a Client Reported for Hit-and-Run

The client who came to the Incheon hit-and-run attorney requested assistance after being reported for hit-and-run by her husband, with whom she was in divorce litigation.

1. The Client Who Visited the Incheon Hit-and-Run Attorney

To determine whether the client's conduct amounted to a genuine hit-and-run, the Incheon hit-and-run attorney conducted thorough consultation and gathered materials.

The Circumstances of the Case as Grasped by the Incheon Attorney

The client of the Incheon hit-and-run attorney was reported by her husband, with whom she was currently in divorce litigation.

The day of the incident was a visitation day between the children and the husband, and it was the day they met in a parking lot for the client to take custody of the children from the husband.

When the children had all boarded the vehicle and the client was also seated in the driver's seat, the husband asked the children about their schedule for the next visitation day, but when the client said they already had a commitment, the angry husband shouted and used violence, such as kicking the driver's door and the side mirror.

Wanting to leave the bewildering and frightening situation quickly, she hurriedly tried to drive out of the parking lot.

In this situation, the husband claimed that his foot had been run over, but the client, who was unaware of this, left the parking lot in that manner and was reported for hit-and-run by the husband.

The Charge Faced by the Client Who Came to the Incheon Attorney

The husband, the alleged victim, asserted that the client faced a charge of ‘hit-and-run causing injury.’

He claimed that, even though his foot had been run over and he had fallen, she fled while leaving him unattended.

What is the crime of hit-and-run causing injury?

The crime of hit-and-run causing injury, commonly also called ‘hit-and-run,’ is a charge that may apply where a driver, while operating a vehicle on the road, causes property damage or personal injury but fails to provide proper rescue measures for the victim or fails to take adequate subsequent measures.

The relevant applicable charge is as follows.

「Road Traffic Act」

▣ Article 54 (Measures at the Time of an Accident)

(1) Where a person is killed or injured or property is damaged due to traffic such as the operation of a vehicle or tram (hereinafter referred to as a "traffic accident"), the driver of the vehicle or tram or another crew member (hereinafter referred to as the "driver, etc.") shall immediately stop and take the following measures.

1. Necessary measures, such as rescuing the casualties

2. Providing the victim with personal information (meaning name, telephone number, address, etc.; the same shall apply in Article 148 and Article 156, Item 10)

▣ Article 148 (Penalty Provisions) A person who fails to take the measures at the time of a traffic accident under Article 54 (1) shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine not exceeding 15 million won.

2. Assistance Provided by the Incheon Hit-and-Run Attorney

The client of the Incheon hit-and-run attorney worked as a public official, and because she would face disciplinary action if this case were prosecuted and would be at a disadvantage in the divorce litigation, she requested that the case absolutely be concluded with a finding of no charge.

For the client's finding of no charge, Daeryun thoroughly analyzed the evidence, such as the CCTV footage from the time of the incident, and presented the following defense.

Hit-and-Run Attorney's Argument ① The Client's Conduct Was Not Unlawful

On the day of the incident, even though the children were all in the vehicle, the husband displayed violence, such as striking the car door and folding in the side mirror.

She wished to leave the parking lot quickly to calm the children, and the attorney argued that, in this situation, it was difficult for her to know that the victim had been run over by the vehicle's wheel.

Because she did not know this fact and intentionally flee, the client lacked the very intent required as an element of the offense,

and the attorney argued that, even if such intent existed, the conduct constituted an 'act of necessity' or a 'justifiable act,' and therefore was not unlawful.

Hit-and-Run Attorney's Argument ② The CCTV Footage Cannot Serve as Evidence

The husband used the CCTV footage as evidence to claim that his foot had been run over and he had fallen, but the attorney argued that whether the victim's foot had actually been pinned under the vehicle while the client was driving out of the parking lot could not be precisely shown by the CCTV footage alone.

3. As a Result of the Incheon Hit-and-Run Attorney's Assistance, a Non-Prosecution Decision Was Obtained

Based on the situation the client had experienced, the Incheon hit-and-run attorney proved that the intent required for the crime of hit-and-run causing injury, namely that she fled while aware that the victim had been injured, was not true, and as a result was able to obtain a non-prosecution decision.

When the Assistance of a Hit-and-Run Attorney Is Needed

A hit-and-run case proceeds because, from the victim's standpoint, it cannot be known whether the person fled while aware of the accident or fled without recognizing it.

If you become involved in such a matter, it may be helpful to work out a solution and prepare for trial together with an Incheon hit-and-run attorney at Daeryun who has extensive experience in hit-and-run cases.

[인천뺑소니변호사 조력 사례] 남편으로부터 뺑소니 신고 당한 의뢰인, 인천뺑소니변호사의 조력으로 불기소 혐의 받아내

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Violation of the Road Traffic Act (hit-and-run injury): Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney HanSik CHOI

HanSik CHOI

T. 070-5221-2387

Attorney specializing in drunk driving

Attorney YeSum LEE

YeSum LEE

T. 070-7510-1044

Attorney specializing in drunk driving

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Busan Administrative Litigation Attorney | Busan Administrative Litigation Attorney Who Obtained a Stay of Execution of the Revocation of Implementation Plan Approval

Next

[Yongsan Real Estate Attorney Sentence Reduction Case] Yongsan Real Estate Attorney Who Helped Overturn the Original Judgment and Obtain a Suspended Sentence

View list
Quick Menu

Chat